对学生编程能力的评估

Eduard Kuric, M. Bieliková
{"title":"对学生编程能力的评估","authors":"Eduard Kuric, M. Bieliková","doi":"10.1145/2652524.2652561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Despite the fact, that the various automated expertise metrics were proposed, we do not know which metrics the most reliably capture/reflect expertise. Goal: To define metrics for estimation of developer's expertise based on programming tasks, to evaluate which of them most reliably capture expertise, and to propose and evaluate an automatic process to compare the metrics. Method: We define three expertise metrics with respects to such characteristics as spent time, performed activities and complexity of source code. We evaluate Spearman's correlation between our expertise metrics and students' score obtained after completion of a programming course with 251 students. Results: The best (very strong) correlation is between the metrics based on complexity of source code and the student's qualification points. Conclusions: Very strong but not perfect correlation is between our estimation of student's expertise and his/her score in the second third of the course. Approximately in the middle of the course we might be able to predict students' grades.","PeriodicalId":124452,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of student's programming expertise\",\"authors\":\"Eduard Kuric, M. Bieliková\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2652524.2652561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Despite the fact, that the various automated expertise metrics were proposed, we do not know which metrics the most reliably capture/reflect expertise. Goal: To define metrics for estimation of developer's expertise based on programming tasks, to evaluate which of them most reliably capture expertise, and to propose and evaluate an automatic process to compare the metrics. Method: We define three expertise metrics with respects to such characteristics as spent time, performed activities and complexity of source code. We evaluate Spearman's correlation between our expertise metrics and students' score obtained after completion of a programming course with 251 students. Results: The best (very strong) correlation is between the metrics based on complexity of source code and the student's qualification points. Conclusions: Very strong but not perfect correlation is between our estimation of student's expertise and his/her score in the second third of the course. Approximately in the middle of the course we might be able to predict students' grades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

上下文:尽管提出了各种自动化的专家指标,但我们不知道哪个指标最可靠地捕获/反映专家。目标:定义基于编程任务的开发人员专业知识的评估指标,评估哪一个最可靠地获取专业知识,并建议和评估一个自动过程来比较这些指标。方法:我们根据花费的时间、执行的活动和源代码的复杂性等特征定义了三种专业知识度量。我们评估了Spearman的专业技术指标与251名学生完成编程课程后获得的学生分数之间的相关性。结果:最好的(非常强的)相关性是在基于源代码复杂性的度量和学生的资格点之间。结论:我们对学生专业知识的估计与他/她在课程后三分之一的成绩之间存在很强但不完全的相关性。大约在课程中间,我们可以预测学生的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of student's programming expertise
Context: Despite the fact, that the various automated expertise metrics were proposed, we do not know which metrics the most reliably capture/reflect expertise. Goal: To define metrics for estimation of developer's expertise based on programming tasks, to evaluate which of them most reliably capture expertise, and to propose and evaluate an automatic process to compare the metrics. Method: We define three expertise metrics with respects to such characteristics as spent time, performed activities and complexity of source code. We evaluate Spearman's correlation between our expertise metrics and students' score obtained after completion of a programming course with 251 students. Results: The best (very strong) correlation is between the metrics based on complexity of source code and the student's qualification points. Conclusions: Very strong but not perfect correlation is between our estimation of student's expertise and his/her score in the second third of the course. Approximately in the middle of the course we might be able to predict students' grades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信