Karolina Mieszkowska, Agnieszka Otwinowska, M. Białecka-Pikul, Dorota Kiebzak-Mandera, Marcin Opacki, E. Haman
{"title":"波兰MAIN:它是如何发展的,到目前为止是如何使用的?","authors":"Karolina Mieszkowska, Agnieszka Otwinowska, M. Białecka-Pikul, Dorota Kiebzak-Mandera, Marcin Opacki, E. Haman","doi":"10.21248/ZASPIL.64.2020.571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis paper describes in detail the development of the Polish version of the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (LITMUS-MAIN). We first describe its two earlier versions, the unpublished version and the published version, developed in 2012, as well as the revised version. We also justify the differences between the unpublished Polish version developed in 2012 and the original MAIN. Then we summarize the results from studies that used the unpublished version of the Polish MAIN. We end with outlining a study that could be conducted to compare the two slightly different procedures in order to examine whether the results obtained with MAIN are resistant to changes in the procedure details. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":232649,"journal":{"name":"ZAS Papers in Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polish MAIN: how was it developed and how has it been used so far?\",\"authors\":\"Karolina Mieszkowska, Agnieszka Otwinowska, M. Białecka-Pikul, Dorota Kiebzak-Mandera, Marcin Opacki, E. Haman\",\"doi\":\"10.21248/ZASPIL.64.2020.571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nThis paper describes in detail the development of the Polish version of the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (LITMUS-MAIN). We first describe its two earlier versions, the unpublished version and the published version, developed in 2012, as well as the revised version. We also justify the differences between the unpublished Polish version developed in 2012 and the original MAIN. Then we summarize the results from studies that used the unpublished version of the Polish MAIN. We end with outlining a study that could be conducted to compare the two slightly different procedures in order to examine whether the results obtained with MAIN are resistant to changes in the procedure details. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":232649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZAS Papers in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZAS Papers in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21248/ZASPIL.64.2020.571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZAS Papers in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/ZASPIL.64.2020.571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Polish MAIN: how was it developed and how has it been used so far?
This paper describes in detail the development of the Polish version of the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (LITMUS-MAIN). We first describe its two earlier versions, the unpublished version and the published version, developed in 2012, as well as the revised version. We also justify the differences between the unpublished Polish version developed in 2012 and the original MAIN. Then we summarize the results from studies that used the unpublished version of the Polish MAIN. We end with outlining a study that could be conducted to compare the two slightly different procedures in order to examine whether the results obtained with MAIN are resistant to changes in the procedure details.