体育博彩市场是半强有效的吗?来自COVID-19大流行的证据

P. Meier, Raphael Flepp, E. Franck
{"title":"体育博彩市场是半强有效的吗?来自COVID-19大流行的证据","authors":"P. Meier, Raphael Flepp, E. Franck","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3676515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines whether sports betting markets are semistrong-form efficient—i.e., whether new information is rapidly and completely incorporated into betting prices. We use the news of ghost matches in the top European football leagues due to the COVID-19 pandemic as the arrival of public information. Because spectators are absent in ghost games, the home field advantage is reduced, and we test whether this information is fully reflected in betting prices. Our results show that bookmakers systematically overestimate a home team’s winning probability during the first period of the ghost games, which suggests that betting markets are, at least temporally, not semistrong-form efficient. We exploit a betting strategy that yields a positive net payoff over more than one month.","PeriodicalId":430354,"journal":{"name":"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Sports Betting Markets Semistrong Efficient? Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"P. Meier, Raphael Flepp, E. Franck\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3676515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines whether sports betting markets are semistrong-form efficient—i.e., whether new information is rapidly and completely incorporated into betting prices. We use the news of ghost matches in the top European football leagues due to the COVID-19 pandemic as the arrival of public information. Because spectators are absent in ghost games, the home field advantage is reduced, and we test whether this information is fully reflected in betting prices. Our results show that bookmakers systematically overestimate a home team’s winning probability during the first period of the ghost games, which suggests that betting markets are, at least temporally, not semistrong-form efficient. We exploit a betting strategy that yields a positive net payoff over more than one month.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文考察了体育博彩市场是否具有半强形式效率。,新信息是否被迅速和完全地纳入投注价格。我们以欧洲顶级足球联赛因新冠肺炎疫情而出现的幽灵比赛的新闻作为公共信息的到来。由于在幽灵游戏中没有观众,主场优势降低,我们检验这一信息是否充分反映在投注价格中。我们的研究结果表明,在幽灵比赛的第一阶段,博彩公司系统地高估了主队的获胜概率,这表明博彩市场至少暂时不是半强形式有效的。我们利用一种投注策略,在一个多月的时间里产生正的净收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Sports Betting Markets Semistrong Efficient? Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic
This paper examines whether sports betting markets are semistrong-form efficient—i.e., whether new information is rapidly and completely incorporated into betting prices. We use the news of ghost matches in the top European football leagues due to the COVID-19 pandemic as the arrival of public information. Because spectators are absent in ghost games, the home field advantage is reduced, and we test whether this information is fully reflected in betting prices. Our results show that bookmakers systematically overestimate a home team’s winning probability during the first period of the ghost games, which suggests that betting markets are, at least temporally, not semistrong-form efficient. We exploit a betting strategy that yields a positive net payoff over more than one month.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信