{"title":"关注非人类动物的人类责任而非法律人格","authors":"R. L. Cupp","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay supports an emphasis on evolving standards of human responsibility for animals’ welfare and critiques the concept of legal personhood for chimpanzees set forth in the plaintiff’s brief in the State of New York Supreme Court, County of New York lawsuit The Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Lavery. The essay is being published alongside a brief by Professor Laurence Tribe supporting concepts in the lawsuit and alongside the Nonhuman Rights Project’s case brief.","PeriodicalId":136205,"journal":{"name":"Pace Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focusing on Human Responsibility Rather than Legal Personhood for Nonhuman Animals\",\"authors\":\"R. L. Cupp\",\"doi\":\"10.58948/0738-6206.1797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay supports an emphasis on evolving standards of human responsibility for animals’ welfare and critiques the concept of legal personhood for chimpanzees set forth in the plaintiff’s brief in the State of New York Supreme Court, County of New York lawsuit The Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Lavery. The essay is being published alongside a brief by Professor Laurence Tribe supporting concepts in the lawsuit and alongside the Nonhuman Rights Project’s case brief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pace Environmental Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pace Environmental Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
这篇文章支持强调人类对动物福利责任的不断发展的标准，并批评了在纽约州最高法院、纽约州县起诉the Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Lavery的原告摘要中提出的黑猩猩法人资格的概念。这篇文章与劳伦斯·特赖布教授支持诉讼概念的摘要以及非人权项目的案件摘要一起发表。
Focusing on Human Responsibility Rather than Legal Personhood for Nonhuman Animals
This essay supports an emphasis on evolving standards of human responsibility for animals’ welfare and critiques the concept of legal personhood for chimpanzees set forth in the plaintiff’s brief in the State of New York Supreme Court, County of New York lawsuit The Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Lavery. The essay is being published alongside a brief by Professor Laurence Tribe supporting concepts in the lawsuit and alongside the Nonhuman Rights Project’s case brief.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
