阅读练习与阅读规范:动员化可能吗?

Aleksander Kiossev
{"title":"阅读练习与阅读规范:动员化可能吗?","authors":"Aleksander Kiossev","doi":"10.37708/bf.swu.v31i3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores what individual readers mean by \"to read enough\" and \"to read properly\", i.e. the norm that governs reading practices. The hypothesis is that in recent decades, the normative ideas have been extremely diverse, they detached themselves to a certain extend from the reading practices and spread in different directions. This dispersal, the hypothesis states, is also associated with a reduction of the cultural imperative to read. The question is whether mobilizations are thinkable – i.e. whether it is possible to encourage the heterogeneous readers and reading communities to follow a more coherent reading norm as well as what the content of this norm could be.","PeriodicalId":345221,"journal":{"name":"Balkanistic Forum, SOCIAL ANXIETY AND SOURCES OF MOBILISATION","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Practices and Reading Norms: are Mobilizations Possible?\",\"authors\":\"Aleksander Kiossev\",\"doi\":\"10.37708/bf.swu.v31i3.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper explores what individual readers mean by \\\"to read enough\\\" and \\\"to read properly\\\", i.e. the norm that governs reading practices. The hypothesis is that in recent decades, the normative ideas have been extremely diverse, they detached themselves to a certain extend from the reading practices and spread in different directions. This dispersal, the hypothesis states, is also associated with a reduction of the cultural imperative to read. The question is whether mobilizations are thinkable – i.e. whether it is possible to encourage the heterogeneous readers and reading communities to follow a more coherent reading norm as well as what the content of this norm could be.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Balkanistic Forum, SOCIAL ANXIETY AND SOURCES OF MOBILISATION\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Balkanistic Forum, SOCIAL ANXIETY AND SOURCES OF MOBILISATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37708/bf.swu.v31i3.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkanistic Forum, SOCIAL ANXIETY AND SOURCES OF MOBILISATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/bf.swu.v31i3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了个体读者所说的“读得够多”和“读得恰当”,即支配阅读行为的规范。本文的假设是,近几十年来,规范观念的多样性极大,它们在一定程度上脱离了阅读实践,并向不同的方向传播。该假说认为,这种分散也与文化中阅读必要性的减少有关。问题是动员是否可以想象——也就是说,是否有可能鼓励异质读者和阅读社区遵循更连贯的阅读规范,以及这种规范的内容可能是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reading Practices and Reading Norms: are Mobilizations Possible?
The paper explores what individual readers mean by "to read enough" and "to read properly", i.e. the norm that governs reading practices. The hypothesis is that in recent decades, the normative ideas have been extremely diverse, they detached themselves to a certain extend from the reading practices and spread in different directions. This dispersal, the hypothesis states, is also associated with a reduction of the cultural imperative to read. The question is whether mobilizations are thinkable – i.e. whether it is possible to encourage the heterogeneous readers and reading communities to follow a more coherent reading norm as well as what the content of this norm could be.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信