RB持续时间实验原始数据

UQ eSpace Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.14264/1c1d874

Jenny Burt, Jack M. I. Leggett

{"title":"RB持续时间实验原始数据","authors":"Jenny Burt, Jack M. I. Leggett","doi":"10.14264/1c1d874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four experiments examined accuracy for a 72 ms target word (C2) that was preceded by an identical or unrelated word (C1), with an intervening distractor word between C1 and C2. Participants identified (only) C2 in a 3-item choice test. The duration of C1 and the distractor varied factorially (72 vs. 120 ms) over experiments, and the effect on repetition blindness was examined.","PeriodicalId":243136,"journal":{"name":"UQ eSpace","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raw data for RB Duration Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Burt, Jack M. I. Leggett\",\"doi\":\"10.14264/1c1d874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Four experiments examined accuracy for a 72 ms target word (C2) that was preceded by an identical or unrelated word (C1), with an intervening distractor word between C1 and C2. Participants identified (only) C2 in a 3-item choice test. The duration of C1 and the distractor varied factorially (72 vs. 120 ms) over experiments, and the effect on repetition blindness was examined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UQ eSpace\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UQ eSpace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14264/1c1d874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UQ eSpace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14264/1c1d874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

四个实验测试了在一个72毫秒的目标词(C2)之前有一个相同或不相关的词(C1)，在C1和C2之间有一个干扰词的准确性。参与者在3项选择测试中(仅)识别出C2。在实验中，C1和分心物的持续时间呈因子变化(72 vs 120 ms)，并检查了对重复盲的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Raw data for RB Duration Experiments

Four experiments examined accuracy for a 72 ms target word (C2) that was preceded by an identical or unrelated word (C1), with an intervening distractor word between C1 and C2. Participants identified (only) C2 in a 3-item choice test. The duration of C1 and the distractor varied factorially (72 vs. 120 ms) over experiments, and the effect on repetition blindness was examined.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

UQ eSpace

自引率

0.00%

发文量