培训主题下图书馆员初始知识的聚类

Faizhal Arif Santosa, Dedi Suprianto
{"title":"培训主题下图书馆员初始知识的聚类","authors":"Faizhal Arif Santosa, Dedi Suprianto","doi":"10.20473/rlj.v8-i2.2022.347-358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background of study: The implementation of librarian competency development through training in Sidenreng Rappang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, was carried out by dividing librarians based on the location of their agency's work area. In practice, there are training barriers, namely differences in absorption of the material due to limited training time and differences in initial knowledge of the training material.\nPurpose: According to the librarian's prior knowledge of the training to be held in future, this study attempts to determine the best grouping and number of participants.\nMethod: The methodology used in this research is Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) which consists of 6 stages. The data collection technique used a questionnaire with a linear numerical scale from a score of 0 to 10 to 97 librarians in Sidenreng Rappang Regency. Data were analyzed using the K-Means algorithm to determine the number of groups and the number of librarians in each group and evaluated using the Davies-Bouldin index (DBI) algorithm to determine the most optimal group division.\nFindings: According to this study, the best number of groups for training in the processing of library materials is two under a DBI value of 0.68983. With a DBI value of 0.69431, the best number of groups is two in the library promotion training.\nConclusion: the library service training had the best number of groups of 2 with a DBI value of 0.65698. Meanwhile, for INLISLite-based automation training, the best number of groups is two groups with a DBI value of 0.65500.","PeriodicalId":250848,"journal":{"name":"Record and Library Journal","volume":"12 2.1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clustering of Librarians' Initial Knowledge on the Theme of Training\",\"authors\":\"Faizhal Arif Santosa, Dedi Suprianto\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/rlj.v8-i2.2022.347-358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background of study: The implementation of librarian competency development through training in Sidenreng Rappang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, was carried out by dividing librarians based on the location of their agency's work area. In practice, there are training barriers, namely differences in absorption of the material due to limited training time and differences in initial knowledge of the training material.\\nPurpose: According to the librarian's prior knowledge of the training to be held in future, this study attempts to determine the best grouping and number of participants.\\nMethod: The methodology used in this research is Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) which consists of 6 stages. The data collection technique used a questionnaire with a linear numerical scale from a score of 0 to 10 to 97 librarians in Sidenreng Rappang Regency. Data were analyzed using the K-Means algorithm to determine the number of groups and the number of librarians in each group and evaluated using the Davies-Bouldin index (DBI) algorithm to determine the most optimal group division.\\nFindings: According to this study, the best number of groups for training in the processing of library materials is two under a DBI value of 0.68983. With a DBI value of 0.69431, the best number of groups is two in the library promotion training.\\nConclusion: the library service training had the best number of groups of 2 with a DBI value of 0.65698. Meanwhile, for INLISLite-based automation training, the best number of groups is two groups with a DBI value of 0.65500.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Record and Library Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 2.1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Record and Library Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.v8-i2.2022.347-358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Record and Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.v8-i2.2022.347-358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景:在南苏拉威西省Sidenreng Rappang县,通过培训实施图书馆员能力发展,根据其机构工作区域的位置对图书馆员进行了划分。在实践中,存在培训障碍,即由于培训时间有限,对培训材料的吸收存在差异,对培训材料的初始认识存在差异。目的:根据图书馆员对未来培训的先验知识,试图确定最佳的分组和人数。方法:本研究采用的方法是跨行业数据挖掘标准流程(CRISP-DM),分为6个阶段。数据收集技术采用线性数字量表,从0到10分对Sidenreng Rappang县的97名图书馆员进行问卷调查。使用K-Means算法对数据进行分析,确定分组数量和每组图书馆员数量,并使用davis - bouldin指数(DBI)算法进行评估,确定最优分组划分。研究发现:在DBI值为0.68983时,图书馆资料加工培训的最佳分组数为2。当DBI值为0.69431时,图书馆推广培训的最佳分组数为2。结论:图书馆服务培训以2组为最优,DBI值为0.65698。同时,对于基于inlislite的自动化培训,最佳组数为2组,DBI值为0.65500。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clustering of Librarians' Initial Knowledge on the Theme of Training
Background of study: The implementation of librarian competency development through training in Sidenreng Rappang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, was carried out by dividing librarians based on the location of their agency's work area. In practice, there are training barriers, namely differences in absorption of the material due to limited training time and differences in initial knowledge of the training material. Purpose: According to the librarian's prior knowledge of the training to be held in future, this study attempts to determine the best grouping and number of participants. Method: The methodology used in this research is Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) which consists of 6 stages. The data collection technique used a questionnaire with a linear numerical scale from a score of 0 to 10 to 97 librarians in Sidenreng Rappang Regency. Data were analyzed using the K-Means algorithm to determine the number of groups and the number of librarians in each group and evaluated using the Davies-Bouldin index (DBI) algorithm to determine the most optimal group division. Findings: According to this study, the best number of groups for training in the processing of library materials is two under a DBI value of 0.68983. With a DBI value of 0.69431, the best number of groups is two in the library promotion training. Conclusion: the library service training had the best number of groups of 2 with a DBI value of 0.65698. Meanwhile, for INLISLite-based automation training, the best number of groups is two groups with a DBI value of 0.65500.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信