评估在线地球科学课程中不同的评估类型

Emre Dinç, April Millet
{"title":"评估在线地球科学课程中不同的评估类型","authors":"Emre Dinç, April Millet","doi":"10.33965/celda2022_202207l029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effect of different assessment types on overall success in an online geoscience course covering energy’s impact on the environment. Two groups took either the slower 1-credit or the faster 3-credit version of the course, which utilized the same content. Self-assessment questions developed using H5P, quizzes, summative assessment labs, and a capstone project were used to assess students. Independent samples t-test, multiple regression analysis, and repeated measures ANOVA were conducted for data analyses. Quiz success significantly differed between groups. Quiz, capstone, and lab assignment successes were significant positive predictors of overall success. The total frequency of answering H5P questions was a significant positive predictor of quiz and lab assignment successes. Frequencies for answering H5P questions and time spent on H5P questions in each module showed significant differences.","PeriodicalId":200458,"journal":{"name":"Proceeedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA 2022)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATING DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT TYPES IN AN ONLINE GEOSCIENCE COURSE\",\"authors\":\"Emre Dinç, April Millet\",\"doi\":\"10.33965/celda2022_202207l029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the effect of different assessment types on overall success in an online geoscience course covering energy’s impact on the environment. Two groups took either the slower 1-credit or the faster 3-credit version of the course, which utilized the same content. Self-assessment questions developed using H5P, quizzes, summative assessment labs, and a capstone project were used to assess students. Independent samples t-test, multiple regression analysis, and repeated measures ANOVA were conducted for data analyses. Quiz success significantly differed between groups. Quiz, capstone, and lab assignment successes were significant positive predictors of overall success. The total frequency of answering H5P questions was a significant positive predictor of quiz and lab assignment successes. Frequencies for answering H5P questions and time spent on H5P questions in each module showed significant differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA 2022)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA 2022)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2022_202207l029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2022_202207l029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了不同评估类型对在线地球科学课程总体成功的影响,该课程涵盖能源对环境的影响。两组分别学习慢一点的1学分课程和快一点的3学分课程,这两种课程都使用了相同的内容。使用H5P开发的自我评估问题、测验、总结性评估实验室和一个顶点项目来评估学生。数据分析采用独立样本t检验、多元回归分析和重复测量方差分析。测验的成功程度在两组之间有显著差异。测验、顶点测验和实验作业的成功是整体成功的显著正向预测因子。回答H5P问题的总频率是测验和实验室作业成功的显著正向预测因子。在每个模块中,回答H5P问题的频率和回答H5P问题的时间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATING DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT TYPES IN AN ONLINE GEOSCIENCE COURSE
This study investigated the effect of different assessment types on overall success in an online geoscience course covering energy’s impact on the environment. Two groups took either the slower 1-credit or the faster 3-credit version of the course, which utilized the same content. Self-assessment questions developed using H5P, quizzes, summative assessment labs, and a capstone project were used to assess students. Independent samples t-test, multiple regression analysis, and repeated measures ANOVA were conducted for data analyses. Quiz success significantly differed between groups. Quiz, capstone, and lab assignment successes were significant positive predictors of overall success. The total frequency of answering H5P questions was a significant positive predictor of quiz and lab assignment successes. Frequencies for answering H5P questions and time spent on H5P questions in each module showed significant differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信