在正面碰撞时,三岁儿童使用面向前方的儿童约束系统和面向后方的儿童约束系统哪个更安全?

Edyta Rola, Daniel Wdowicz
{"title":"在正面碰撞时,三岁儿童使用面向前方的儿童约束系统和面向后方的儿童约束系统哪个更安全?","authors":"Edyta Rola, Daniel Wdowicz","doi":"10.1109/IIPHDW.2018.8388340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, it remains a contentious issue whether it is safer to transport children rear-facing or forward-facing — in Sweden, children are transported rear facing up to the age of 4 years and in Australia only up to 6 months. The aim of the study was to investigate whether it is safer to transport a three-year-old child in a forward-facing child restraint system or in a rear-facing one. In the study, a child dummy model of the Q-series representing a 3-year-old child was considered. Biomechanical injury criteria connected with the most important body regions and its critical value were defined. The frontal impact with several impact speeds were analyzed. For all tested configurations a higher risk of serious injury to head and neck was indicated for forward-facing child seat. On this basis, it could be concluded that it is safer to transport a child in the rear-facing child seat.","PeriodicalId":405270,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it safer to transport a three-year-old child in a forward-facing child restraint system or in a rear-facing one while head-on collision?\",\"authors\":\"Edyta Rola, Daniel Wdowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IIPHDW.2018.8388340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, it remains a contentious issue whether it is safer to transport children rear-facing or forward-facing — in Sweden, children are transported rear facing up to the age of 4 years and in Australia only up to 6 months. The aim of the study was to investigate whether it is safer to transport a three-year-old child in a forward-facing child restraint system or in a rear-facing one. In the study, a child dummy model of the Q-series representing a 3-year-old child was considered. Biomechanical injury criteria connected with the most important body regions and its critical value were defined. The frontal impact with several impact speeds were analyzed. For all tested configurations a higher risk of serious injury to head and neck was indicated for forward-facing child seat. On this basis, it could be concluded that it is safer to transport a child in the rear-facing child seat.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIPHDW.2018.8388340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIPHDW.2018.8388340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目前,儿童朝后还是朝前更安全仍然是一个有争议的问题——在瑞典,4岁以下的儿童是朝后运输的,而在澳大利亚只有6个月大的儿童是朝后运输的。这项研究的目的是调查一个三岁的孩子坐在一个面向前方的儿童约束系统还是一个面向后方的儿童约束系统中更安全。在研究中,我们考虑了一个代表3岁儿童的q系列儿童假人模型。定义了与人体最重要部位相关的生物力学损伤标准及其临界值。对不同碰撞速度下的正面碰撞进行了分析。对于所有测试的配置,头部和颈部严重受伤的风险较高的前面向儿童座椅表示。在此基础上,可以得出这样的结论:使用后面向儿童座椅运送儿童更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is it safer to transport a three-year-old child in a forward-facing child restraint system or in a rear-facing one while head-on collision?
Currently, it remains a contentious issue whether it is safer to transport children rear-facing or forward-facing — in Sweden, children are transported rear facing up to the age of 4 years and in Australia only up to 6 months. The aim of the study was to investigate whether it is safer to transport a three-year-old child in a forward-facing child restraint system or in a rear-facing one. In the study, a child dummy model of the Q-series representing a 3-year-old child was considered. Biomechanical injury criteria connected with the most important body regions and its critical value were defined. The frontal impact with several impact speeds were analyzed. For all tested configurations a higher risk of serious injury to head and neck was indicated for forward-facing child seat. On this basis, it could be concluded that it is safer to transport a child in the rear-facing child seat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信