模型效用评价

J. Scholtz, Oriana Love, M. Whiting, Duncan Hodges, Lia Emanuel, D. Fraser
{"title":"模型效用评价","authors":"J. Scholtz, Oriana Love, M. Whiting, Duncan Hodges, Lia Emanuel, D. Fraser","doi":"10.1145/2669557.2669562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present three case studies of utility evaluations of underlying models in software systems: a user-model, technical and social models both singly and in combination, and a research-based model for user identification. Each of the three cases used a different approach to evaluating the model and each had challenges to overcome in designing and implementing the evaluation. We describe the methods we used and challenges faced in designing the evaluation procedures, summarize the lessons learned, enumerate considerations for those undertaking such evaluations, and present directions for future work.","PeriodicalId":179584,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility evaluation of models\",\"authors\":\"J. Scholtz, Oriana Love, M. Whiting, Duncan Hodges, Lia Emanuel, D. Fraser\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2669557.2669562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present three case studies of utility evaluations of underlying models in software systems: a user-model, technical and social models both singly and in combination, and a research-based model for user identification. Each of the three cases used a different approach to evaluating the model and each had challenges to overcome in designing and implementing the evaluation. We describe the methods we used and challenges faced in designing the evaluation procedures, summarize the lessons learned, enumerate considerations for those undertaking such evaluations, and present directions for future work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2669557.2669562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了软件系统中基础模型的效用评估的三个案例研究:用户模型、单独和组合的技术和社会模型,以及基于研究的用户识别模型。这三个案例中的每一个都使用了不同的方法来评估模型,并且在设计和实现评估时都有需要克服的挑战。我们描述了我们在设计评估程序时使用的方法和面临的挑战,总结了吸取的教训,列举了那些进行此类评估的人的考虑因素,并提出了未来工作的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility evaluation of models
In this paper, we present three case studies of utility evaluations of underlying models in software systems: a user-model, technical and social models both singly and in combination, and a research-based model for user identification. Each of the three cases used a different approach to evaluating the model and each had challenges to overcome in designing and implementing the evaluation. We describe the methods we used and challenges faced in designing the evaluation procedures, summarize the lessons learned, enumerate considerations for those undertaking such evaluations, and present directions for future work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信