小型无人机轮缘驱动风扇中铜和铝绕组的性能比较

R. Bolam, Y. Vagapov, A. Anuchin
{"title":"小型无人机轮缘驱动风扇中铜和铝绕组的性能比较","authors":"R. Bolam, Y. Vagapov, A. Anuchin","doi":"10.1109/ICEPDS47235.2020.9249076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rim Driven Fans (RDFs) are receiving increased attention amongst zero-emission aerospace technologists as they offer the potential for high Fan Pressure Ratios (FPR) to be efficiently generated and fan flow to be maximised compared with conventional (hub driven) electrical axial-flow fans. In other words; RDFs can provide higher thrust performance and exhaust air velocities than hub driven devices of the same intake area and also offer significant aerodynamic drag reductions. As such they are a feasible propulsion contender for fixed-wing, distributed-thrust, electrical aircraft designs. Thrust-to-weight ratio is a critical design parameter when considering aircraft propulsion devices and so design mass must be optimised accordingly. This paper presents an electromagnetic comparison of copper versus aluminium, slot-less, brushless DC motor (BLDC), stator-wiring architectures. The results of this study identify the performance benefits and limitations of these differing stator wiring materials in the context of a single rotor-stage RDF intended for the propulsion of a small unmanned aircraft.","PeriodicalId":115427,"journal":{"name":"2020 XI International Conference on Electrical Power Drive Systems (ICEPDS)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison between Copper and Aluminium Windings in a Rim Driven Fan for a Small Unmanned Aircraft Application\",\"authors\":\"R. Bolam, Y. Vagapov, A. Anuchin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEPDS47235.2020.9249076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rim Driven Fans (RDFs) are receiving increased attention amongst zero-emission aerospace technologists as they offer the potential for high Fan Pressure Ratios (FPR) to be efficiently generated and fan flow to be maximised compared with conventional (hub driven) electrical axial-flow fans. In other words; RDFs can provide higher thrust performance and exhaust air velocities than hub driven devices of the same intake area and also offer significant aerodynamic drag reductions. As such they are a feasible propulsion contender for fixed-wing, distributed-thrust, electrical aircraft designs. Thrust-to-weight ratio is a critical design parameter when considering aircraft propulsion devices and so design mass must be optimised accordingly. This paper presents an electromagnetic comparison of copper versus aluminium, slot-less, brushless DC motor (BLDC), stator-wiring architectures. The results of this study identify the performance benefits and limitations of these differing stator wiring materials in the context of a single rotor-stage RDF intended for the propulsion of a small unmanned aircraft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 XI International Conference on Electrical Power Drive Systems (ICEPDS)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 XI International Conference on Electrical Power Drive Systems (ICEPDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPDS47235.2020.9249076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 XI International Conference on Electrical Power Drive Systems (ICEPDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPDS47235.2020.9249076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

轮辋驱动风扇(rdf)越来越受到零排放航空航天技术专家的关注,因为与传统的(轮毂驱动的)电动轴流风扇相比,它们具有高效产生高风扇压力比(FPR)和最大风扇流量的潜力。换句话说;与相同进气面积的轮毂驱动装置相比,RDFs可以提供更高的推力性能和排气速度,并且还可以显著减少空气阻力。因此,它们是固定翼、分布推力、电动飞机设计的可行推进竞争者。推重比是飞机推进装置设计的关键参数,因此必须对设计质量进行优化。本文介绍了铜与铝,无槽,无刷直流电机(BLDC),定子接线架构的电磁比较。本研究的结果确定了这些不同的定子接线材料在用于小型无人机推进的单转子级RDF背景下的性能优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison between Copper and Aluminium Windings in a Rim Driven Fan for a Small Unmanned Aircraft Application
Rim Driven Fans (RDFs) are receiving increased attention amongst zero-emission aerospace technologists as they offer the potential for high Fan Pressure Ratios (FPR) to be efficiently generated and fan flow to be maximised compared with conventional (hub driven) electrical axial-flow fans. In other words; RDFs can provide higher thrust performance and exhaust air velocities than hub driven devices of the same intake area and also offer significant aerodynamic drag reductions. As such they are a feasible propulsion contender for fixed-wing, distributed-thrust, electrical aircraft designs. Thrust-to-weight ratio is a critical design parameter when considering aircraft propulsion devices and so design mass must be optimised accordingly. This paper presents an electromagnetic comparison of copper versus aluminium, slot-less, brushless DC motor (BLDC), stator-wiring architectures. The results of this study identify the performance benefits and limitations of these differing stator wiring materials in the context of a single rotor-stage RDF intended for the propulsion of a small unmanned aircraft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信