旁观者之眼:政治风险、制度类型与中国跨国公司

Weiyi Shi, Boliang Zhu
{"title":"旁观者之眼:政治风险、制度类型与中国跨国公司","authors":"Weiyi Shi, Boliang Zhu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3224685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chinese investment has been observed to favor politically risky destinations and authoritarian \ncountries, which is puzzling for the conventional understanding of multinational corporations. \nOne prevailing explanation is that Chinese firms’ embeddedness in risky, authoritarian institutions \nat home enhances their capabilities to cope with risks abroad. We argue, however, that the risk \nmitigation strategies firms employ in autocracies are often extra-institutional due to a lack of \ninstitutionalized political access and credible commitments; they require the accumulation of \ncountry-specific knowledge and political capital, and thus, are not easily transferrable. Therefore, \nwe expect that Chinese investors remain sensitive to political risks in host countries. Empirically \nwe leverage two experiments embedded in original surveys of business executives and find that \nChinese firms are deterred by a wide range of political risks and have no preference for autocracy. \nOur study provides new insights into our understanding of the risk preferences and behavior of \nChinese investors.","PeriodicalId":333672,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Global Strategy & Tactics (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the Eye of the Beholder: Political Risk, Regime Type, and China’s Multinational Corporations\",\"authors\":\"Weiyi Shi, Boliang Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3224685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chinese investment has been observed to favor politically risky destinations and authoritarian \\ncountries, which is puzzling for the conventional understanding of multinational corporations. \\nOne prevailing explanation is that Chinese firms’ embeddedness in risky, authoritarian institutions \\nat home enhances their capabilities to cope with risks abroad. We argue, however, that the risk \\nmitigation strategies firms employ in autocracies are often extra-institutional due to a lack of \\ninstitutionalized political access and credible commitments; they require the accumulation of \\ncountry-specific knowledge and political capital, and thus, are not easily transferrable. Therefore, \\nwe expect that Chinese investors remain sensitive to political risks in host countries. Empirically \\nwe leverage two experiments embedded in original surveys of business executives and find that \\nChinese firms are deterred by a wide range of political risks and have no preference for autocracy. \\nOur study provides new insights into our understanding of the risk preferences and behavior of \\nChinese investors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTL: Global Strategy & Tactics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTL: Global Strategy & Tactics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Global Strategy & Tactics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

据观察,中国的投资倾向于政治风险高的目的地和威权国家,这让人们对跨国公司的传统理解感到困惑。一种普遍的解释是,中国企业在国内处于高风险的专制制度中,这增强了它们应对国外风险的能力。然而,我们认为,由于缺乏制度化的政治渠道和可信的承诺,公司在专制国家采用的风险缓解策略往往是制度外的;它们需要积累特定国家的知识和政治资本,因此不容易转移。因此,我们预计中国投资者仍将对东道国的政治风险保持敏感。从经验上看,我们利用了对企业高管的原始调查中嵌入的两个实验,发现中国企业被广泛的政治风险所吓倒,并且对专制没有偏好。我们的研究为我们理解中国投资者的风险偏好和行为提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the Eye of the Beholder: Political Risk, Regime Type, and China’s Multinational Corporations
Chinese investment has been observed to favor politically risky destinations and authoritarian countries, which is puzzling for the conventional understanding of multinational corporations. One prevailing explanation is that Chinese firms’ embeddedness in risky, authoritarian institutions at home enhances their capabilities to cope with risks abroad. We argue, however, that the risk mitigation strategies firms employ in autocracies are often extra-institutional due to a lack of institutionalized political access and credible commitments; they require the accumulation of country-specific knowledge and political capital, and thus, are not easily transferrable. Therefore, we expect that Chinese investors remain sensitive to political risks in host countries. Empirically we leverage two experiments embedded in original surveys of business executives and find that Chinese firms are deterred by a wide range of political risks and have no preference for autocracy. Our study provides new insights into our understanding of the risk preferences and behavior of Chinese investors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信