用户建模方法

M. LaLomia, M. Coovert
{"title":"用户建模方法","authors":"M. LaLomia, M. Coovert","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1989.48018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The three existing approaches to user modeling-GOMS (goals, operators, methods, and selection rules), production simulation, and mental models-are examined. Each approach is described, relevant experimental research is reviewed, and each approach is summarized in terms of its advantages, limitations, and applicability to the system design process. It is suggested that these approaches are inadequate to account fully for the interplay between human information processing, user characteristics, computer systems, and the demands of the various tasks. An alternative approach to user modeling that utilizes structural covariance analysis is presented. A theoretical causal model of the human-computer interaction, which incorporates the user, system, and task characteristics, is described and discussed in terms of applying structural analysis to the theorized pattern of causation among the user, system, and task. How this approach can provide useful information for guiding the design process is discussed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":325958,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to user modeling\",\"authors\":\"M. LaLomia, M. Coovert\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.1989.48018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The three existing approaches to user modeling-GOMS (goals, operators, methods, and selection rules), production simulation, and mental models-are examined. Each approach is described, relevant experimental research is reviewed, and each approach is summarized in terms of its advantages, limitations, and applicability to the system design process. It is suggested that these approaches are inadequate to account fully for the interplay between human information processing, user characteristics, computer systems, and the demands of the various tasks. An alternative approach to user modeling that utilizes structural covariance analysis is presented. A theoretical causal model of the human-computer interaction, which incorporates the user, system, and task characteristics, is described and discussed in terms of applying structural analysis to the theorized pattern of causation among the user, system, and task. How this approach can provide useful information for guiding the design process is discussed.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":325958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.48018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.48018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究了用户建模的三种现有方法——goms(目标、操作人员、方法和选择规则)、生产模拟和心智模型。对每种方法进行了描述,对相关的实验研究进行了回顾,并对每种方法的优点、局限性和对系统设计过程的适用性进行了总结。有人认为,这些方法不足以充分考虑人类信息处理、用户特征、计算机系统和各种任务需求之间的相互作用。提出了一种利用结构协方差分析的用户建模替代方法。结合了用户、系统和任务特征的人机交互的理论因果模型,通过对用户、系统和任务之间因果关系的理论模式进行结构分析来描述和讨论。讨论了这种方法如何为指导设计过程提供有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaches to user modeling
The three existing approaches to user modeling-GOMS (goals, operators, methods, and selection rules), production simulation, and mental models-are examined. Each approach is described, relevant experimental research is reviewed, and each approach is summarized in terms of its advantages, limitations, and applicability to the system design process. It is suggested that these approaches are inadequate to account fully for the interplay between human information processing, user characteristics, computer systems, and the demands of the various tasks. An alternative approach to user modeling that utilizes structural covariance analysis is presented. A theoretical causal model of the human-computer interaction, which incorporates the user, system, and task characteristics, is described and discussed in terms of applying structural analysis to the theorized pattern of causation among the user, system, and task. How this approach can provide useful information for guiding the design process is discussed.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信