取样方法和贮存条件对沼气中挥发性甲基硅氧烷定量的影响

Jia Wang, Liwei Liao, Li’ao Wang, Lei Wang
{"title":"取样方法和贮存条件对沼气中挥发性甲基硅氧烷定量的影响","authors":"Jia Wang, Liwei Liao, Li’ao Wang, Lei Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3919661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Siloxanes are widely distributed in biogas and have a negative impact on energy applications of biogas. So far, there is no standard method for the sampling and analysis of siloxanes in biogas. The appropriate sampling method must ensure that the composition of samples collected in siloxanes does not change during sampling and analysis. To this end, three sampling methods (two-tandem (section A and B) impingers with acetone as adsorbent (TTIA), coconut activated carbon adsorbent tubes (CACT), and silica gel adsorbent tubes (SGT)) were evaluated in this paper. Hexamethyldisiloxane (L2), hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D3), octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) detected in section B were less than 7% of those in section A of three methods. The gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used for quantitative analysis of the siloxane in samples. The results demonstrated that target compounds were completely adsorbed by three methods. For D3, D4, and D5, there was no significant difference between recovery rates of CACT and SGT, whereas they were higher than those of TTIA. The siloxane contents in dry synthesis gas collected by three methods were generally higher than those in wet synthesis gas. The effect of storage time and temperature on the short-term stability of siloxanes in SGT was further investigated. The contents of D3, D4, and D5 did not change significantly with storage temperatures except L2. However, the content of D3 stored at 25 ℃ was not stable over time, which reduced by 16.2% on average at 12 h.","PeriodicalId":313084,"journal":{"name":"EnergyRN eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Sampling Methods and Storage Condition on Volatile Methyl Siloxanes Quantification in Biogas\",\"authors\":\"Jia Wang, Liwei Liao, Li’ao Wang, Lei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3919661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Siloxanes are widely distributed in biogas and have a negative impact on energy applications of biogas. So far, there is no standard method for the sampling and analysis of siloxanes in biogas. The appropriate sampling method must ensure that the composition of samples collected in siloxanes does not change during sampling and analysis. To this end, three sampling methods (two-tandem (section A and B) impingers with acetone as adsorbent (TTIA), coconut activated carbon adsorbent tubes (CACT), and silica gel adsorbent tubes (SGT)) were evaluated in this paper. Hexamethyldisiloxane (L2), hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D3), octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) detected in section B were less than 7% of those in section A of three methods. The gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used for quantitative analysis of the siloxane in samples. The results demonstrated that target compounds were completely adsorbed by three methods. For D3, D4, and D5, there was no significant difference between recovery rates of CACT and SGT, whereas they were higher than those of TTIA. The siloxane contents in dry synthesis gas collected by three methods were generally higher than those in wet synthesis gas. The effect of storage time and temperature on the short-term stability of siloxanes in SGT was further investigated. The contents of D3, D4, and D5 did not change significantly with storage temperatures except L2. However, the content of D3 stored at 25 ℃ was not stable over time, which reduced by 16.2% on average at 12 h.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EnergyRN eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EnergyRN eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EnergyRN eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

硅氧烷广泛存在于沼气中,对沼气的能源利用产生不利影响。目前,对沼气中硅氧烷的采样和分析尚无标准的方法。适当的取样方法必须确保在取样和分析过程中硅氧烷样品的组成不会改变。为此,本文对丙酮为吸附剂(TTIA)、椰子活性炭吸附管(CACT)和硅胶吸附管(SGT)三种采样方法进行了评价。三种方法中,B切片检出的六甲基二硅氧烷(L2)、六甲基环三硅氧烷(D3)、八甲基环四硅氧烷(D4)、十甲基环五硅氧烷(D5)的检出率均低于A切片的7%。采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术对样品中的硅氧烷进行了定量分析。结果表明,三种方法均能完全吸附目标化合物。对于D3、D4和D5, CACT和SGT的恢复率无显著性差异,而TTIA的恢复率高于CACT。三种方法采集的干法合成气中硅氧烷含量普遍高于湿法合成气。进一步研究了储存时间和温度对硅氧烷在SGT中短期稳定性的影响。除L2外,D3、D4、D5的含量随贮藏温度的变化不显著。然而,在25℃下保存的D3含量不稳定,在12 h时平均下降16.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Sampling Methods and Storage Condition on Volatile Methyl Siloxanes Quantification in Biogas
Siloxanes are widely distributed in biogas and have a negative impact on energy applications of biogas. So far, there is no standard method for the sampling and analysis of siloxanes in biogas. The appropriate sampling method must ensure that the composition of samples collected in siloxanes does not change during sampling and analysis. To this end, three sampling methods (two-tandem (section A and B) impingers with acetone as adsorbent (TTIA), coconut activated carbon adsorbent tubes (CACT), and silica gel adsorbent tubes (SGT)) were evaluated in this paper. Hexamethyldisiloxane (L2), hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D3), octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) detected in section B were less than 7% of those in section A of three methods. The gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used for quantitative analysis of the siloxane in samples. The results demonstrated that target compounds were completely adsorbed by three methods. For D3, D4, and D5, there was no significant difference between recovery rates of CACT and SGT, whereas they were higher than those of TTIA. The siloxane contents in dry synthesis gas collected by three methods were generally higher than those in wet synthesis gas. The effect of storage time and temperature on the short-term stability of siloxanes in SGT was further investigated. The contents of D3, D4, and D5 did not change significantly with storage temperatures except L2. However, the content of D3 stored at 25 ℃ was not stable over time, which reduced by 16.2% on average at 12 h.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信