Gelb网格法评价不同错颌的下颌髁突位置

D. Soni, Rohit Khanna, T. Tikku, R. Maurya, S. Verma, K. Srivastava
{"title":"Gelb网格法评价不同错颌的下颌髁突位置","authors":"D. Soni, Rohit Khanna, T. Tikku, R. Maurya, S. Verma, K. Srivastava","doi":"10.18231/j.ijodr.2022.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess condylar position using Gelb’s grid in subjects with different malocclusion. Pre- treatment lateral cephalogram of 45 subjects (aged above 18yrs) were taken and equally divided in three groups, Group I(skeletal Class I malocclusion), Group II-(skeletal Class II malocclusion) and Group III (Class III malocclusion) based on three Cephalometric parameters (ANB, Yen angle and Wits appraisal). Condylar position in relation to glenoid fossa was assessed with Gelb’s grid. For Group I condyle was positioned normally (4,7) in 86.66% of subjects and was positioned posteriorly (5,8)13.33% of subjects. For Group II condyle was displaced posteriorly (5,8) in 86.66% of subjects and in normal position (4,7) for remaining subjects. For Group III subjects condyle was again found in posteriorly displaced 66.66% of subjects and normally positioned in rest of subjects. It can be suggested that the condylar position showed variability in three malocclusion groups. Class I malocclusion group with no skeletal discrepancy was associated with more symmetric normal condylar position than malocclusion groups with skeletal discrepancy (Class II and Class III).","PeriodicalId":269485,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","volume":"143 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of mandibular condylar position in different malocclusion with Gelb’s grid\",\"authors\":\"D. Soni, Rohit Khanna, T. Tikku, R. Maurya, S. Verma, K. Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijodr.2022.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To assess condylar position using Gelb’s grid in subjects with different malocclusion. Pre- treatment lateral cephalogram of 45 subjects (aged above 18yrs) were taken and equally divided in three groups, Group I(skeletal Class I malocclusion), Group II-(skeletal Class II malocclusion) and Group III (Class III malocclusion) based on three Cephalometric parameters (ANB, Yen angle and Wits appraisal). Condylar position in relation to glenoid fossa was assessed with Gelb’s grid. For Group I condyle was positioned normally (4,7) in 86.66% of subjects and was positioned posteriorly (5,8)13.33% of subjects. For Group II condyle was displaced posteriorly (5,8) in 86.66% of subjects and in normal position (4,7) for remaining subjects. For Group III subjects condyle was again found in posteriorly displaced 66.66% of subjects and normally positioned in rest of subjects. It can be suggested that the condylar position showed variability in three malocclusion groups. Class I malocclusion group with no skeletal discrepancy was associated with more symmetric normal condylar position than malocclusion groups with skeletal discrepancy (Class II and Class III).\",\"PeriodicalId\":269485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research\",\"volume\":\"143 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.2022.028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.2022.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应用Gelb网格对不同错颌患者的髁突位置进行评估。对45例18岁以上的受试者进行治疗前侧位脑电图检查,根据3个颅面测量参数(ANB、Yen角和Wits评价)将其平均分为3组:ⅰ组(骨骼ⅰ类错颌合)、ⅱ组(骨骼ⅱ类错颌合)和ⅲ组(骨骼ⅲ类错颌合)。用Gelb网格评估髁突相对于盂窝的位置。第一组患者髁突正常(4,7)位占86.66%,后位占13.33%(5,8)。第二组中86.66%的受试者髁突向后移位(5,8),其余受试者髁突处于正常位置(4,7)。对于第三组,66.66%的受试者髁突再次向后移位,其余受试者髁突位置正常。这表明髁突位置在三个错颌组中表现出变异性。无骨骼差异的I类错颌组比有骨骼差异的I类错颌组(II类和III类)有更对称的正常髁位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of mandibular condylar position in different malocclusion with Gelb’s grid
To assess condylar position using Gelb’s grid in subjects with different malocclusion. Pre- treatment lateral cephalogram of 45 subjects (aged above 18yrs) were taken and equally divided in three groups, Group I(skeletal Class I malocclusion), Group II-(skeletal Class II malocclusion) and Group III (Class III malocclusion) based on three Cephalometric parameters (ANB, Yen angle and Wits appraisal). Condylar position in relation to glenoid fossa was assessed with Gelb’s grid. For Group I condyle was positioned normally (4,7) in 86.66% of subjects and was positioned posteriorly (5,8)13.33% of subjects. For Group II condyle was displaced posteriorly (5,8) in 86.66% of subjects and in normal position (4,7) for remaining subjects. For Group III subjects condyle was again found in posteriorly displaced 66.66% of subjects and normally positioned in rest of subjects. It can be suggested that the condylar position showed variability in three malocclusion groups. Class I malocclusion group with no skeletal discrepancy was associated with more symmetric normal condylar position than malocclusion groups with skeletal discrepancy (Class II and Class III).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信