Godspeed系列问卷使用情况的Meta分析

2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) Pub Date : 2015-11-23 DOI:10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333568

A. Weiss, C. Bartneck

{"title":"Godspeed系列问卷使用情况的Meta分析","authors":"A. Weiss, C. Bartneck","doi":"10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standardized metrics for assessing the success of robots is a necessity for a research field to compare and validate results. The Godspeed Questionnaire Series (GQS) is one of the most frequently used questionnaires in the field of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) with over 160 citations as of October 2014. In this paper, we present a meta analysis of studies that used the GQS. The HRI community uses a large variety of robotic platforms and only the NAO robot seems to be used by multiple research groups. A qualitative meta analysis of 18 NAO studies reveals accumulated findings on perceived intelligence, likability, and anthropomorphism, but also reveals contradictions on how the robot's behaviour and task context impact GQS ratings. The paper closes with a reflection on how added value of data analysis and presentation could be achieved for the HRI community in future.","PeriodicalId":119467,"journal":{"name":"2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed Questionnaire Series\",\"authors\":\"A. Weiss, C. Bartneck\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standardized metrics for assessing the success of robots is a necessity for a research field to compare and validate results. The Godspeed Questionnaire Series (GQS) is one of the most frequently used questionnaires in the field of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) with over 160 citations as of October 2014. In this paper, we present a meta analysis of studies that used the GQS. The HRI community uses a large variety of robotic platforms and only the NAO robot seems to be used by multiple research groups. A qualitative meta analysis of 18 NAO studies reveals accumulated findings on perceived intelligence, likability, and anthropomorphism, but also reveals contradictions on how the robot's behaviour and task context impact GQS ratings. The paper closes with a reflection on how added value of data analysis and presentation could be achieved for the HRI community in future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"92\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 92

摘要

评估机器人成功的标准化指标是一个研究领域比较和验证结果的必要条件。Godspeed问卷系列(GQS)是人机交互(HRI)领域最常用的问卷之一，截至2014年10月，被引用次数超过160次。在本文中，我们对使用GQS的研究进行了荟萃分析。HRI社区使用各种各样的机器人平台，只有NAO机器人似乎被多个研究小组使用。一项对18项NAO研究的定性元分析揭示了在感知智力、可爱度和拟人化方面的累积发现，但也揭示了机器人的行为和任务环境如何影响GQS评分的矛盾。本文最后反思了未来如何为HRI社区实现数据分析和呈现的附加价值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed Questionnaire Series

Standardized metrics for assessing the success of robots is a necessity for a research field to compare and validate results. The Godspeed Questionnaire Series (GQS) is one of the most frequently used questionnaires in the field of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) with over 160 citations as of October 2014. In this paper, we present a meta analysis of studies that used the GQS. The HRI community uses a large variety of robotic platforms and only the NAO robot seems to be used by multiple research groups. A qualitative meta analysis of 18 NAO studies reveals accumulated findings on perceived intelligence, likability, and anthropomorphism, but also reveals contradictions on how the robot's behaviour and task context impact GQS ratings. The paper closes with a reflection on how added value of data analysis and presentation could be achieved for the HRI community in future.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)

自引率

0.00%

发文量