用于工程设计优化的新型鲁棒性措施

Philipp Fleck, M. Kommenda, Thorsten Prante, M. Affenzeller
{"title":"用于工程设计优化的新型鲁棒性措施","authors":"Philipp Fleck, M. Kommenda, Thorsten Prante, M. Affenzeller","doi":"10.1504/IJSPM.2018.093757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents novel robustness measures to analyse and compare the robustness of solutions for constrained optimisation problems in the field of engineering design optimisation. First, we define uncertainty in production processes and present a method to quantify uncertainty. Based on the variations of a solution that are introduced by uncertainty, we want to assess the robustness of those solutions towards those variations. We show how a solution's quality and feasibility (with regards to constraint violation) change with increasing uncertainty and discuss how those changes determine the robustness of that solution. Furthermore, we present a method of aggregating that information into a single, real-valued robustness measure. This novel robustness measure can be used to select solutions that have a high robustness along with a high quality. To test the presented measures extensively, we apply them to various solutions for benchmark problems from published literature in the field of engineering design optimisation.","PeriodicalId":266151,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Simul. Process. Model.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel robustness measures for engineering design optimisation\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Fleck, M. Kommenda, Thorsten Prante, M. Affenzeller\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJSPM.2018.093757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents novel robustness measures to analyse and compare the robustness of solutions for constrained optimisation problems in the field of engineering design optimisation. First, we define uncertainty in production processes and present a method to quantify uncertainty. Based on the variations of a solution that are introduced by uncertainty, we want to assess the robustness of those solutions towards those variations. We show how a solution's quality and feasibility (with regards to constraint violation) change with increasing uncertainty and discuss how those changes determine the robustness of that solution. Furthermore, we present a method of aggregating that information into a single, real-valued robustness measure. This novel robustness measure can be used to select solutions that have a high robustness along with a high quality. To test the presented measures extensively, we apply them to various solutions for benchmark problems from published literature in the field of engineering design optimisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Simul. Process. Model.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Simul. Process. Model.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSPM.2018.093757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Simul. Process. Model.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSPM.2018.093757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文提出了新的鲁棒性测度来分析和比较工程设计优化领域中约束优化问题解的鲁棒性。首先,我们定义了生产过程中的不确定性,并提出了一种量化不确定性的方法。基于由不确定性引入的解决方案的变化,我们希望评估这些解决方案对这些变化的鲁棒性。我们展示了解决方案的质量和可行性(关于约束违反)如何随着不确定性的增加而变化,并讨论了这些变化如何决定解决方案的健壮性。此外,我们提出了一种方法,将这些信息聚合到一个单一的,实值鲁棒性测度。这种新颖的鲁棒性度量可用于选择具有高鲁棒性和高质量的解。为了广泛测试所提出的措施,我们将它们应用于工程设计优化领域已发表文献中基准问题的各种解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel robustness measures for engineering design optimisation
This paper presents novel robustness measures to analyse and compare the robustness of solutions for constrained optimisation problems in the field of engineering design optimisation. First, we define uncertainty in production processes and present a method to quantify uncertainty. Based on the variations of a solution that are introduced by uncertainty, we want to assess the robustness of those solutions towards those variations. We show how a solution's quality and feasibility (with regards to constraint violation) change with increasing uncertainty and discuss how those changes determine the robustness of that solution. Furthermore, we present a method of aggregating that information into a single, real-valued robustness measure. This novel robustness measure can be used to select solutions that have a high robustness along with a high quality. To test the presented measures extensively, we apply them to various solutions for benchmark problems from published literature in the field of engineering design optimisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信