贝叶斯组合拍卖:将单一买家机制扩展到多买家

S. Alaei
{"title":"贝叶斯组合拍卖:将单一买家机制扩展到多买家","authors":"S. Alaei","doi":"10.1137/120878422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For Bayesian combinatorial auctions, we present a general framework for approximately reducing the mechanism design problem for multiple buyers to the mechanism design problem for each individual buyer. Our framework can be applied to any setting which roughly satisfies the following assumptions: (i) The buyer's types must be distributed independently (not necessarily identically). (ii) The objective function must be linearly separable over the set of buyers (iii) The supply constraints must be the only constraints involving more than one buyer. Our framework is general in the sense that it makes no explicit assumption about any of the following: (i) The buyer's valuations (e.g., sub modular, additive, etc). (ii) The distribution of types for each buyer. (iii) The other constraints involving individual buyers (e.g., budget constraints, etc). We present two generic $n$-buyer mechanisms that use $1$-buyer mechanisms as black boxes. Assuming that we have an$\\alpha$-approximate $1$-buyer mechanism for each buyer\\footnote{Note that we can use different $1$-buyer mechanisms to accommodate different classes of buyers.} and assuming that no buyer ever needs more than $\\frac{1}{k}$ of all copies of each item for some integer $k \\ge 1$, then our generic $n$-buyer mechanisms are $\\gamma_k\\cdot\\alpha$-approximation of the optimal$n$-buyer mechanism, in which $\\gamma_k$ is a constant which is at least $1-\\frac{1}{\\sqrt{k+3}}$. Observe that $\\gamma_k$ is at least $\\frac{1}{2}$ (for $k=1$) and approaches $1$ as $k$ increases. As a byproduct of our construction, we improve a generalization of prophet inequalities. Furthermore, as applications of our main theorem, we improve several results from the literature.","PeriodicalId":326048,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"220","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions: Expanding Single Buyer Mechanisms to Many Buyers\",\"authors\":\"S. Alaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/120878422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For Bayesian combinatorial auctions, we present a general framework for approximately reducing the mechanism design problem for multiple buyers to the mechanism design problem for each individual buyer. Our framework can be applied to any setting which roughly satisfies the following assumptions: (i) The buyer's types must be distributed independently (not necessarily identically). (ii) The objective function must be linearly separable over the set of buyers (iii) The supply constraints must be the only constraints involving more than one buyer. Our framework is general in the sense that it makes no explicit assumption about any of the following: (i) The buyer's valuations (e.g., sub modular, additive, etc). (ii) The distribution of types for each buyer. (iii) The other constraints involving individual buyers (e.g., budget constraints, etc). We present two generic $n$-buyer mechanisms that use $1$-buyer mechanisms as black boxes. Assuming that we have an$\\\\alpha$-approximate $1$-buyer mechanism for each buyer\\\\footnote{Note that we can use different $1$-buyer mechanisms to accommodate different classes of buyers.} and assuming that no buyer ever needs more than $\\\\frac{1}{k}$ of all copies of each item for some integer $k \\\\ge 1$, then our generic $n$-buyer mechanisms are $\\\\gamma_k\\\\cdot\\\\alpha$-approximation of the optimal$n$-buyer mechanism, in which $\\\\gamma_k$ is a constant which is at least $1-\\\\frac{1}{\\\\sqrt{k+3}}$. Observe that $\\\\gamma_k$ is at least $\\\\frac{1}{2}$ (for $k=1$) and approaches $1$ as $k$ increases. As a byproduct of our construction, we improve a generalization of prophet inequalities. Furthermore, as applications of our main theorem, we improve several results from the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"220\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/120878422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/120878422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 220

摘要

对于贝叶斯组合拍卖,我们提出了一个将多买家的机制设计问题近似化为单个买家的机制设计问题的一般框架。我们的框架可以适用于大致满足以下假设的任何设置:(i)买方的类型必须独立分布(不一定相同)。(ii)目标函数在购买者集合上必须是线性可分的(iii)供应约束必须是涉及一个以上购买者的唯一约束。我们的框架是通用的,因为它对以下任何情况都没有明确的假设:(i)买方的估值(例如,子模块,加法等)。(ii)每个买方的型号分配。(iii)涉及个人购买者的其他限制(例如,预算限制等)。我们提出了两种通用的$n$ -买方机制,它们使用$1$ -买方机制作为黑盒。假设每个买家\footnote{请注意,我们可以使用不同的$1$ -buyer机制来容纳不同类别的买家。}都有一个$\alpha$ -近似$1$ -买家机制,并且假设没有买家需要超过$\frac{1}{k}$的每个项目的所有副本来获得某个整数$k \ge 1$,那么我们的通用$n$ -买家机制是$\gamma_k\cdot\alpha$ -最优$n$ -买家机制的近似,其中$\gamma_k$是一个常数,至少是$1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{k+3}}$。观察到$\gamma_k$至少是$\frac{1}{2}$(对于$k=1$),并且随着$k$的增加而接近$1$。作为我们构造的副产品,我们改进了先知不等式的一般化。此外,作为我们主要定理的应用,我们改进了文献中的几个结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bayesian Combinatorial Auctions: Expanding Single Buyer Mechanisms to Many Buyers
For Bayesian combinatorial auctions, we present a general framework for approximately reducing the mechanism design problem for multiple buyers to the mechanism design problem for each individual buyer. Our framework can be applied to any setting which roughly satisfies the following assumptions: (i) The buyer's types must be distributed independently (not necessarily identically). (ii) The objective function must be linearly separable over the set of buyers (iii) The supply constraints must be the only constraints involving more than one buyer. Our framework is general in the sense that it makes no explicit assumption about any of the following: (i) The buyer's valuations (e.g., sub modular, additive, etc). (ii) The distribution of types for each buyer. (iii) The other constraints involving individual buyers (e.g., budget constraints, etc). We present two generic $n$-buyer mechanisms that use $1$-buyer mechanisms as black boxes. Assuming that we have an$\alpha$-approximate $1$-buyer mechanism for each buyer\footnote{Note that we can use different $1$-buyer mechanisms to accommodate different classes of buyers.} and assuming that no buyer ever needs more than $\frac{1}{k}$ of all copies of each item for some integer $k \ge 1$, then our generic $n$-buyer mechanisms are $\gamma_k\cdot\alpha$-approximation of the optimal$n$-buyer mechanism, in which $\gamma_k$ is a constant which is at least $1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{k+3}}$. Observe that $\gamma_k$ is at least $\frac{1}{2}$ (for $k=1$) and approaches $1$ as $k$ increases. As a byproduct of our construction, we improve a generalization of prophet inequalities. Furthermore, as applications of our main theorem, we improve several results from the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信