行动者/行动者网络理论:南部非洲环境教育研究的新兴方法论

G. Nhamo
{"title":"行动者/行动者网络理论:南部非洲环境教育研究的新兴方法论","authors":"G. Nhamo","doi":"10.4314/SAJEE.V23I0.122722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deliberates on actor/actant-network theory (AANT) as methodology for policy research in  environmental education (EE). Insights are drawn from work that applied AANT to research environmental  policy processes surrounding the formulation and implementation of South Africa’s Plastic Bags Regulations of 2003. The paper reveals that the application of AANT methodology made it possible to trace relationships,  actors, actants and actor/actant-networks surrounding the Plastic Bags Regulations as quasi-object (token). The methodology also enabled a focus on understanding and investigating tensions, debates and responses  emerging from the policy process. The findings were that after the promulgation of the first draft of the Plastic Bags Regulations in May 2000, tensions emerged around the nature of regulation (whether to use the command and control approach – preferred by Organised Government – or self regulation – preferred by Organised Business and Organised Labour). From these findings, a series of conceptual frameworks were drawn up as identified around key actors and actor/actant-networks. The conceptual frameworks included among them, Organised Government, Organised Business and Organised Labour.","PeriodicalId":272843,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actor/Actant-Network Theory as Emerging Methodology for Environmental Education Research in Southern Africa\",\"authors\":\"G. Nhamo\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SAJEE.V23I0.122722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deliberates on actor/actant-network theory (AANT) as methodology for policy research in  environmental education (EE). Insights are drawn from work that applied AANT to research environmental  policy processes surrounding the formulation and implementation of South Africa’s Plastic Bags Regulations of 2003. The paper reveals that the application of AANT methodology made it possible to trace relationships,  actors, actants and actor/actant-networks surrounding the Plastic Bags Regulations as quasi-object (token). The methodology also enabled a focus on understanding and investigating tensions, debates and responses  emerging from the policy process. The findings were that after the promulgation of the first draft of the Plastic Bags Regulations in May 2000, tensions emerged around the nature of regulation (whether to use the command and control approach – preferred by Organised Government – or self regulation – preferred by Organised Business and Organised Labour). From these findings, a series of conceptual frameworks were drawn up as identified around key actors and actor/actant-networks. The conceptual frameworks included among them, Organised Government, Organised Business and Organised Labour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJEE.V23I0.122722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAJEE.V23I0.122722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文探讨了行动者/行动者网络理论(AANT)作为环境教育政策研究的方法论。从应用AANT研究围绕2003年南非塑料袋条例的制定和实施的环境政策过程的工作中得出的见解。该论文揭示了AANT方法的应用使得可以将围绕塑料袋法规的关系、行为者、行为者和行为者/行为者网络作为准对象(令牌)进行跟踪。该方法还使人们能够重点理解和调查政策过程中出现的紧张局势、辩论和反应。调查结果显示,在2000年5月《塑料袋规例》初稿公布后,监管的性质出现了紧张局势(是使用有组织的政府喜欢的命令和控制方法,还是有组织的企业和有组织的劳工喜欢的自我监管)。根据这些发现,围绕关键行为者和行为者/行为者网络制定了一系列概念性框架。其中的概念框架包括有组织的政府、有组织的企业和有组织的劳工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Actor/Actant-Network Theory as Emerging Methodology for Environmental Education Research in Southern Africa
This paper deliberates on actor/actant-network theory (AANT) as methodology for policy research in  environmental education (EE). Insights are drawn from work that applied AANT to research environmental  policy processes surrounding the formulation and implementation of South Africa’s Plastic Bags Regulations of 2003. The paper reveals that the application of AANT methodology made it possible to trace relationships,  actors, actants and actor/actant-networks surrounding the Plastic Bags Regulations as quasi-object (token). The methodology also enabled a focus on understanding and investigating tensions, debates and responses  emerging from the policy process. The findings were that after the promulgation of the first draft of the Plastic Bags Regulations in May 2000, tensions emerged around the nature of regulation (whether to use the command and control approach – preferred by Organised Government – or self regulation – preferred by Organised Business and Organised Labour). From these findings, a series of conceptual frameworks were drawn up as identified around key actors and actor/actant-networks. The conceptual frameworks included among them, Organised Government, Organised Business and Organised Labour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信