行为公共经济学政策效率的实验研究

Emre Özyerden
{"title":"行为公共经济学政策效率的实验研究","authors":"Emre Özyerden","doi":"10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Behavioral economics develops as an area with inferences and conclusions to help policy makers in public economics policies. In this study, the effectiveness of public policies formed by using the default choice manipulation and loss aversion concepts are examined through laboratory experiments. In the experiments, participants play a public goods game in groups of 4. In the first experiment, the effect of compulsory staying in a default option on participants’ decisions has been evaluated by comparing the pre-and post-treatment decisions. In the second experiment, the result screens of the participants after each public goods game rounds were framed as loss and gain. Waiting time and loss framing found to have no effect on decisions.","PeriodicalId":313557,"journal":{"name":"34. International Public Finance Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Efficiency of Behavioural Public Economics Policies: an Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Emre Özyerden\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Behavioral economics develops as an area with inferences and conclusions to help policy makers in public economics policies. In this study, the effectiveness of public policies formed by using the default choice manipulation and loss aversion concepts are examined through laboratory experiments. In the experiments, participants play a public goods game in groups of 4. In the first experiment, the effect of compulsory staying in a default option on participants’ decisions has been evaluated by comparing the pre-and post-treatment decisions. In the second experiment, the result screens of the participants after each public goods game rounds were framed as loss and gain. Waiting time and loss framing found to have no effect on decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"34. International Public Finance Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"34. International Public Finance Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34. International Public Finance Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为经济学发展成为一个推论和结论的领域,以帮助政策制定者制定公共经济政策。在本研究中,通过实验室实验检验了使用默认选择操纵和损失厌恶概念所形成的公共政策的有效性。在实验中,参与者以4人为一组玩公共物品游戏。在第一个实验中,通过比较治疗前和治疗后的决定,评估了强制选择默认选项对参与者决策的影响。在第二个实验中,参与者在每个公共物品游戏回合后的结果屏幕被框定为损失和收益。等待时间和损失框架对决策没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Efficiency of Behavioural Public Economics Policies: an Experimental Study
Behavioral economics develops as an area with inferences and conclusions to help policy makers in public economics policies. In this study, the effectiveness of public policies formed by using the default choice manipulation and loss aversion concepts are examined through laboratory experiments. In the experiments, participants play a public goods game in groups of 4. In the first experiment, the effect of compulsory staying in a default option on participants’ decisions has been evaluated by comparing the pre-and post-treatment decisions. In the second experiment, the result screens of the participants after each public goods game rounds were framed as loss and gain. Waiting time and loss framing found to have no effect on decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信