{"title":"Ubuntu:全球正义的新模式?","authors":"Severino Elias Ngoenha","doi":"10.4314/INDILINGA.V5I2.26405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ultra-liberalism and globalization are carried by large international economic organizations.\nSince the second half of the twentieth century, they have been the vectors of an\nincreasing injustice and have widened inequalities between rich countries and the poor\ncountries, the North and the South. These three meta-narratives – ultra-liberalism, globalization\nand (in)justice – mobilize a growing number of intellectuals. The main question is:\ncan liberalism achieve a planetary justice, and, if the answer is no, which alternative model\ncan one think of?\nThrough the concept of Ubuntu (restorative justice), South Africa and African philosophy\ncontribute, by their specific contribution in terms of practices and theory, to the debate of\npolitical philosophy to which justice is central. In theorizing the concept of Ubuntu, African\nphilosophy could bring the first important contribution of the African continent in the\nphilosophical – or multi-field – debate, which largely exceeds the African dimension.\nBy recalling the history and the bonds between the Afro-Americans and South African\nRenaissance, this text develops the concept of Ubuntu and suggests how this concept\nmakes it possible to weave – or reweave – the relations at the planetary level rather than\nto deepen wounds. By exceeding the concept of punitive justice, we can imagine globalization\nnot as an economic apartheid but as a world made of the recognition of one\nhumanity equal in dignity. Keywords : Ubuntu, global justice, restorative justice, liberalism, political philosophy,\nAfrican philosophy model Indilinga Vol. 5 (2) 2006: pp. 125-134","PeriodicalId":151323,"journal":{"name":"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ubuntu: New model of global justice?\",\"authors\":\"Severino Elias Ngoenha\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/INDILINGA.V5I2.26405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ultra-liberalism and globalization are carried by large international economic organizations.\\nSince the second half of the twentieth century, they have been the vectors of an\\nincreasing injustice and have widened inequalities between rich countries and the poor\\ncountries, the North and the South. These three meta-narratives – ultra-liberalism, globalization\\nand (in)justice – mobilize a growing number of intellectuals. The main question is:\\ncan liberalism achieve a planetary justice, and, if the answer is no, which alternative model\\ncan one think of?\\nThrough the concept of Ubuntu (restorative justice), South Africa and African philosophy\\ncontribute, by their specific contribution in terms of practices and theory, to the debate of\\npolitical philosophy to which justice is central. In theorizing the concept of Ubuntu, African\\nphilosophy could bring the first important contribution of the African continent in the\\nphilosophical – or multi-field – debate, which largely exceeds the African dimension.\\nBy recalling the history and the bonds between the Afro-Americans and South African\\nRenaissance, this text develops the concept of Ubuntu and suggests how this concept\\nmakes it possible to weave – or reweave – the relations at the planetary level rather than\\nto deepen wounds. By exceeding the concept of punitive justice, we can imagine globalization\\nnot as an economic apartheid but as a world made of the recognition of one\\nhumanity equal in dignity. Keywords : Ubuntu, global justice, restorative justice, liberalism, political philosophy,\\nAfrican philosophy model Indilinga Vol. 5 (2) 2006: pp. 125-134\",\"PeriodicalId\":151323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/INDILINGA.V5I2.26405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/INDILINGA.V5I2.26405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
极端自由主义和全球化是由大型国际经济组织承载的。自二十世纪下半叶以来,它们一直是日益不公正的载体,并扩大了富国与穷国、北方与南方之间的不平等。这三种元叙事——极端自由主义、全球化和正义——动员了越来越多的知识分子。主要问题是:自由主义能否实现全球正义?如果答案是否定的,我们还能想到哪种替代模式?通过乌班图(恢复性正义)的概念,南非和非洲哲学通过他们在实践和理论方面的具体贡献,为以正义为中心的政治哲学辩论做出了贡献。在将乌班图概念理论化的过程中,非洲哲学可以在哲学或多领域辩论中带来非洲大陆的第一个重要贡献,这在很大程度上超出了非洲的范畴。通过回顾非洲裔美国人和南非文艺复兴之间的历史和联系,本文发展了乌班图的概念,并提出了这个概念如何使编织或重新编织行星层面的关系成为可能,而不是加深伤口。通过超越惩罚性正义的概念,我们可以想象全球化不是一种经济上的种族隔离,而是一个由承认尊严平等的人类组成的世界。关键词:乌班图、全球正义、恢复性正义、自由主义、政治哲学、非洲哲学模式。《Indilinga》Vol. 5 (2) 2006: pp. 125-134
Ultra-liberalism and globalization are carried by large international economic organizations.
Since the second half of the twentieth century, they have been the vectors of an
increasing injustice and have widened inequalities between rich countries and the poor
countries, the North and the South. These three meta-narratives – ultra-liberalism, globalization
and (in)justice – mobilize a growing number of intellectuals. The main question is:
can liberalism achieve a planetary justice, and, if the answer is no, which alternative model
can one think of?
Through the concept of Ubuntu (restorative justice), South Africa and African philosophy
contribute, by their specific contribution in terms of practices and theory, to the debate of
political philosophy to which justice is central. In theorizing the concept of Ubuntu, African
philosophy could bring the first important contribution of the African continent in the
philosophical – or multi-field – debate, which largely exceeds the African dimension.
By recalling the history and the bonds between the Afro-Americans and South African
Renaissance, this text develops the concept of Ubuntu and suggests how this concept
makes it possible to weave – or reweave – the relations at the planetary level rather than
to deepen wounds. By exceeding the concept of punitive justice, we can imagine globalization
not as an economic apartheid but as a world made of the recognition of one
humanity equal in dignity. Keywords : Ubuntu, global justice, restorative justice, liberalism, political philosophy,
African philosophy model Indilinga Vol. 5 (2) 2006: pp. 125-134