传统爵士乐的历史被神话扭曲了吗

Andrew Sanchirico
{"title":"传统爵士乐的历史被神话扭曲了吗","authors":"Andrew Sanchirico","doi":"10.14713/JJS.V8I1.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent book by jazz musician Randall Sandke strongly criticizes jazz writers and scholars for presenting a biased and misleading picture of jazz history. His basic thesis is that, because of ideology, the standard jazz texts exaggerate the importance of African American culture in the development of jazz, thereby creating a mythology of jazz. This article examines one aspect of Sandke’s thesis: his assertion that the myths created by earlier jazz writers are being perpetuated by present day writers. A content analysis of jazz history books published since 1990 indicates that Sandke’s assertion is largely false. Only one of seven myths that he identified appears with any regularity in the current jazz history books.  The six other myths are rarely if ever found in the literature. After describing these findings, the article draws some conclusions.","PeriodicalId":331183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Jazz Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Conventional Jazz History Distorted by Myths\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Sanchirico\",\"doi\":\"10.14713/JJS.V8I1.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recent book by jazz musician Randall Sandke strongly criticizes jazz writers and scholars for presenting a biased and misleading picture of jazz history. His basic thesis is that, because of ideology, the standard jazz texts exaggerate the importance of African American culture in the development of jazz, thereby creating a mythology of jazz. This article examines one aspect of Sandke’s thesis: his assertion that the myths created by earlier jazz writers are being perpetuated by present day writers. A content analysis of jazz history books published since 1990 indicates that Sandke’s assertion is largely false. Only one of seven myths that he identified appears with any regularity in the current jazz history books.  The six other myths are rarely if ever found in the literature. After describing these findings, the article draws some conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Jazz Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Jazz Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14713/JJS.V8I1.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Jazz Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14713/JJS.V8I1.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

爵士音乐家兰德尔·桑德克(Randall Sandke)最近出版的一本书强烈批评爵士作家和学者对爵士历史的描述存在偏见和误导性。他的基本论点是,由于意识形态的原因,标准的爵士乐文本夸大了非裔美国人文化在爵士乐发展中的重要性,从而创造了爵士乐的神话。本文考察了桑德克论文的一个方面:他断言早期爵士作家所创造的神话正在被当代作家所延续。对1990年以来出版的爵士乐历史书籍的内容分析表明,桑德克的断言在很大程度上是错误的。在他确定的七个神话中,只有一个经常出现在当前的爵士乐历史书中。其他六个神话很少在文学作品中找到。在描述了这些发现之后,文章得出了一些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Conventional Jazz History Distorted by Myths
A recent book by jazz musician Randall Sandke strongly criticizes jazz writers and scholars for presenting a biased and misleading picture of jazz history. His basic thesis is that, because of ideology, the standard jazz texts exaggerate the importance of African American culture in the development of jazz, thereby creating a mythology of jazz. This article examines one aspect of Sandke’s thesis: his assertion that the myths created by earlier jazz writers are being perpetuated by present day writers. A content analysis of jazz history books published since 1990 indicates that Sandke’s assertion is largely false. Only one of seven myths that he identified appears with any regularity in the current jazz history books.  The six other myths are rarely if ever found in the literature. After describing these findings, the article draws some conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信