数字公民参与的悖论

A. Porter, Michele H. Jackson
{"title":"数字公民参与的悖论","authors":"A. Porter, Michele H. Jackson","doi":"10.4324/9780429492327-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we investigate how and why paradoxes persist in digital civic participation. Our communicational lens of disorganization builds on the Communication as Constitutive of Organization, or “CCO�? approaches, and literature on multiplicity of objects and practices in order to conceptualize digital civic participation as multiple. We use our communicational approach to disorganization to analyze qualitative data of a digital civic participation project called Mesa Vision 2030. Combining iterative and situational analysis, our findings show how a controversial voting incident at Mesa was enacted in the interference of meanings across three interconnected communication episodes: real-time digital civic participation, its planning and its design. The push-pull for control over which configuration of meaning is in focus contributes a new analytic dimension for the empirical study of disorganization. Our study also makes a methodological contribution to CCO research by providing tools to analyze empirical situations for differences and heterogeneities. As a practical implication, we discuss how civic technology organizations should place greater emphasis on flexible designs of participatory tools that preserve the voices of diverse participants.","PeriodicalId":350153,"journal":{"name":"Dis/Organization as Communication","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of Digital Civic Participation\",\"authors\":\"A. Porter, Michele H. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429492327-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we investigate how and why paradoxes persist in digital civic participation. Our communicational lens of disorganization builds on the Communication as Constitutive of Organization, or “CCO�? approaches, and literature on multiplicity of objects and practices in order to conceptualize digital civic participation as multiple. We use our communicational approach to disorganization to analyze qualitative data of a digital civic participation project called Mesa Vision 2030. Combining iterative and situational analysis, our findings show how a controversial voting incident at Mesa was enacted in the interference of meanings across three interconnected communication episodes: real-time digital civic participation, its planning and its design. The push-pull for control over which configuration of meaning is in focus contributes a new analytic dimension for the empirical study of disorganization. Our study also makes a methodological contribution to CCO research by providing tools to analyze empirical situations for differences and heterogeneities. As a practical implication, we discuss how civic technology organizations should place greater emphasis on flexible designs of participatory tools that preserve the voices of diverse participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dis/Organization as Communication\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dis/Organization as Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492327-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dis/Organization as Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492327-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这项研究中,我们探讨了数字公民参与中悖论如何以及为什么会持续存在。我们对无组织的沟通视角建立在沟通作为组织的组成部分,或“CCO”?方法和文献的对象和实践的多样性,以便概念化数字公民参与的多样性。我们使用我们的沟通方法来分解组织,分析一个名为“梅萨愿景2030”的数字公民参与项目的定性数据。结合迭代和情境分析,我们的研究结果显示了Mesa有争议的投票事件是如何在三个相互关联的通信事件(实时数字公民参与、规划和设计)的意义干扰中制定的。控制哪一种意义配置是焦点的推拉为无序的实证研究提供了一个新的分析维度。我们的研究还为CCO研究提供了分析差异和异质性的实证情况的工具,从而在方法上做出了贡献。作为实践意义,我们讨论了公民技术组织应如何更加重视灵活设计参与性工具,以保护不同参与者的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Paradox of Digital Civic Participation
In this study, we investigate how and why paradoxes persist in digital civic participation. Our communicational lens of disorganization builds on the Communication as Constitutive of Organization, or “CCO�? approaches, and literature on multiplicity of objects and practices in order to conceptualize digital civic participation as multiple. We use our communicational approach to disorganization to analyze qualitative data of a digital civic participation project called Mesa Vision 2030. Combining iterative and situational analysis, our findings show how a controversial voting incident at Mesa was enacted in the interference of meanings across three interconnected communication episodes: real-time digital civic participation, its planning and its design. The push-pull for control over which configuration of meaning is in focus contributes a new analytic dimension for the empirical study of disorganization. Our study also makes a methodological contribution to CCO research by providing tools to analyze empirical situations for differences and heterogeneities. As a practical implication, we discuss how civic technology organizations should place greater emphasis on flexible designs of participatory tools that preserve the voices of diverse participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信