并发症及其处理

H. Kalia
{"title":"并发症及其处理","authors":"H. Kalia","doi":"10.1093/med/9780197607947.003.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews the complications that can occur after minimally invasive surgical fusion of the sacroiliac joint, focusing on infection and neurovascular injuries and their prevention and treatment. The sacroiliac joint has been identified as a potential pain generator in 15% to 30% of chronic low back pain and post-laminectomy syndrome patients. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion via the lateral approach is effective and better tolerated than the open surgical approach. Most of the current studies have focused on efficacy and patient satisfaction as opposed to the safety profile of the procedure. There is a dearth of literature regarding the safety of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Over the past few years, a novel posterior approach to sacroiliac joint fusion has become more common that theoretically is safer and potentially as efficacious as the lateral approach.","PeriodicalId":131285,"journal":{"name":"Sacroiliac Joint Pain","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications and their management\",\"authors\":\"H. Kalia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780197607947.003.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter reviews the complications that can occur after minimally invasive surgical fusion of the sacroiliac joint, focusing on infection and neurovascular injuries and their prevention and treatment. The sacroiliac joint has been identified as a potential pain generator in 15% to 30% of chronic low back pain and post-laminectomy syndrome patients. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion via the lateral approach is effective and better tolerated than the open surgical approach. Most of the current studies have focused on efficacy and patient satisfaction as opposed to the safety profile of the procedure. There is a dearth of literature regarding the safety of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Over the past few years, a novel posterior approach to sacroiliac joint fusion has become more common that theoretically is safer and potentially as efficacious as the lateral approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sacroiliac Joint Pain\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sacroiliac Joint Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197607947.003.0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sacroiliac Joint Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197607947.003.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章回顾微创骶髂关节融合术后可能发生的并发症,重点是感染和神经血管损伤及其预防和治疗。骶髂关节已被确定为15%至30%的慢性腰痛和椎板切除术后综合征患者的潜在疼痛源。经外侧入路微创骶髂关节融合术比开放入路更有效,耐受性更好。目前的大多数研究都集中在疗效和患者满意度上,而不是手术的安全性。关于微创骶髂关节融合术的安全性,目前文献缺乏。在过去的几年中,一种新的骶髂关节融合后路入路变得越来越普遍,理论上更安全,并且可能与外侧入路一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complications and their management
This chapter reviews the complications that can occur after minimally invasive surgical fusion of the sacroiliac joint, focusing on infection and neurovascular injuries and their prevention and treatment. The sacroiliac joint has been identified as a potential pain generator in 15% to 30% of chronic low back pain and post-laminectomy syndrome patients. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion via the lateral approach is effective and better tolerated than the open surgical approach. Most of the current studies have focused on efficacy and patient satisfaction as opposed to the safety profile of the procedure. There is a dearth of literature regarding the safety of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Over the past few years, a novel posterior approach to sacroiliac joint fusion has become more common that theoretically is safer and potentially as efficacious as the lateral approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信