内部市场的立法与裁判:经济推理的作用

J. Franck
{"title":"内部市场的立法与裁判:经济推理的作用","authors":"J. Franck","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3694273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper assesses the extent to which economic arguments may or must influence law-making and adjudication related to the internal market of the EU. Therefore, the normative foundations of the internal market as an instrument of EU law are investigated. Consequences in regard to the internal market competence (Article 114 TFEU) and the choice of regulatory level, ie the EU legislature's choice to harmonise or not to harmonise, are discussed. Using various examples related to the EU fundamental freedoms and EU secondary law, it will be shown that there is indeed scope for economically sound arguments and that there is added value to be gained by including them.","PeriodicalId":401648,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law-Making and Adjudication for the Internal Market: The Role of Economic Reasoning\",\"authors\":\"J. Franck\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3694273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper assesses the extent to which economic arguments may or must influence law-making and adjudication related to the internal market of the EU. Therefore, the normative foundations of the internal market as an instrument of EU law are investigated. Consequences in regard to the internal market competence (Article 114 TFEU) and the choice of regulatory level, ie the EU legislature's choice to harmonise or not to harmonise, are discussed. Using various examples related to the EU fundamental freedoms and EU secondary law, it will be shown that there is indeed scope for economically sound arguments and that there is added value to be gained by including them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":401648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Public Law: EU eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Public Law: EU eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文评估了经济论点可能或必须影响与欧盟内部市场有关的立法和裁决的程度。因此,对内部市场作为欧盟法律工具的规范基础进行了研究。讨论了关于内部市场能力的后果(第114条TFEU)和监管水平的选择,即欧盟立法机构选择协调或不协调。使用与欧盟基本自由和欧盟次级法相关的各种例子,将显示确实存在经济上合理的论点的范围,并且通过包括它们可以获得附加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law-Making and Adjudication for the Internal Market: The Role of Economic Reasoning
This paper assesses the extent to which economic arguments may or must influence law-making and adjudication related to the internal market of the EU. Therefore, the normative foundations of the internal market as an instrument of EU law are investigated. Consequences in regard to the internal market competence (Article 114 TFEU) and the choice of regulatory level, ie the EU legislature's choice to harmonise or not to harmonise, are discussed. Using various examples related to the EU fundamental freedoms and EU secondary law, it will be shown that there is indeed scope for economically sound arguments and that there is added value to be gained by including them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信