Covid-19的全球折衷治疗:全球、区域和国家对共同敌人的看法

Hirshi Anadza, Rommel Utungga Pasopati, S. Syarifuddin
{"title":"Covid-19的全球折衷治疗:全球、区域和国家对共同敌人的看法","authors":"Hirshi Anadza, Rommel Utungga Pasopati, S. Syarifuddin","doi":"10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After being called the UN's, COVID-19 has become a global common enemy today. The escalation of the pandemic has been responded to nationally, regionally, as well as globally. However, the efforts of the United Nations as the most significant international organization are interpreted differently at the regional and national levels. That way, there will be a gap in understanding between the handling of COVID-19 at the global, regional, and national levels. Therefore, this paper discusses further how the COVID-19 as a common global enemy is reflected in regional and national actions against this pandemic? The global eclectic theory is explored to explain how global concepts relate to more specific concepts. Comparing the COVID-19 handling policies in ASEAN, SAARC, and the EU is needed to deeply explain the differences in handling the outbreak in each region. The result shows that common enemies do not automatically reflect joint regional action. National interest is still challenging to consolidate at the regional, furthermore global level. Moreover, cultural differences between countries cannot be reduced quickly in global matters.\n ","PeriodicalId":252813,"journal":{"name":"Nation State: Journal of International Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Eclectic Treatment of Covid-19: Global, Regional, and National Perspectives on Common Enemy\",\"authors\":\"Hirshi Anadza, Rommel Utungga Pasopati, S. Syarifuddin\",\"doi\":\"10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After being called the UN's, COVID-19 has become a global common enemy today. The escalation of the pandemic has been responded to nationally, regionally, as well as globally. However, the efforts of the United Nations as the most significant international organization are interpreted differently at the regional and national levels. That way, there will be a gap in understanding between the handling of COVID-19 at the global, regional, and national levels. Therefore, this paper discusses further how the COVID-19 as a common global enemy is reflected in regional and national actions against this pandemic? The global eclectic theory is explored to explain how global concepts relate to more specific concepts. Comparing the COVID-19 handling policies in ASEAN, SAARC, and the EU is needed to deeply explain the differences in handling the outbreak in each region. The result shows that common enemies do not automatically reflect joint regional action. National interest is still challenging to consolidate at the regional, furthermore global level. Moreover, cultural differences between countries cannot be reduced quickly in global matters.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":252813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nation State: Journal of International Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nation State: Journal of International Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nation State: Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.v4i2.596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎被称为“联合国的”,如今已成为全球共同的敌人。国家、区域和全球都对这一流行病的升级作出了反应。然而,联合国作为最重要的国际组织所作的努力在区域和国家两级有不同的解释。这样,在全球、区域和国家层面对COVID-19的处理之间就会存在理解差距。因此,本文进一步讨论了COVID-19作为全球共同敌人如何反映在区域和国家应对这一流行病的行动中。探讨了全球折衷理论,以解释全球概念如何与更具体的概念相关联。比较东盟、南盟和欧盟三国应对新冠肺炎疫情的政策,可以深刻解释各地区应对疫情的差异。结果表明,共同敌人并不自动反映联合区域行动。在区域乃至全球层面巩固国家利益仍然具有挑战性。此外,在全球事务中,国家之间的文化差异不可能迅速缩小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Eclectic Treatment of Covid-19: Global, Regional, and National Perspectives on Common Enemy
After being called the UN's, COVID-19 has become a global common enemy today. The escalation of the pandemic has been responded to nationally, regionally, as well as globally. However, the efforts of the United Nations as the most significant international organization are interpreted differently at the regional and national levels. That way, there will be a gap in understanding between the handling of COVID-19 at the global, regional, and national levels. Therefore, this paper discusses further how the COVID-19 as a common global enemy is reflected in regional and national actions against this pandemic? The global eclectic theory is explored to explain how global concepts relate to more specific concepts. Comparing the COVID-19 handling policies in ASEAN, SAARC, and the EU is needed to deeply explain the differences in handling the outbreak in each region. The result shows that common enemies do not automatically reflect joint regional action. National interest is still challenging to consolidate at the regional, furthermore global level. Moreover, cultural differences between countries cannot be reduced quickly in global matters.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信