{"title":"MARS日志记录、检查点和恢复的性能分析","authors":"C. Fan, M. Eich","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1989.48043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of a performance analysis used to compare MARS (a main-memory recoverable database with stable log) and MM-DBMS (different main-memory database management system) are reported. With equal numbers and sizes of log records, MARS supports a higher transaction throughput rate than does MM-DBMS. Even with larger numbers of log records, a rate of 1500 transactions per second can be supported by MARS logging. The MARS checkpointing rates are comparable to those of MM-DBMS. In all situations, MARS recovery outperforms that of MM-DBMS.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":325958,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of MARS logging, checkpointing, and recovery\",\"authors\":\"C. Fan, M. Eich\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.1989.48043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of a performance analysis used to compare MARS (a main-memory recoverable database with stable log) and MM-DBMS (different main-memory database management system) are reported. With equal numbers and sizes of log records, MARS supports a higher transaction throughput rate than does MM-DBMS. Even with larger numbers of log records, a rate of 1500 transactions per second can be supported by MARS logging. The MARS checkpointing rates are comparable to those of MM-DBMS. In all situations, MARS recovery outperforms that of MM-DBMS.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":325958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.48043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.48043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance analysis of MARS logging, checkpointing, and recovery
The results of a performance analysis used to compare MARS (a main-memory recoverable database with stable log) and MM-DBMS (different main-memory database management system) are reported. With equal numbers and sizes of log records, MARS supports a higher transaction throughput rate than does MM-DBMS. Even with larger numbers of log records, a rate of 1500 transactions per second can be supported by MARS logging. The MARS checkpointing rates are comparable to those of MM-DBMS. In all situations, MARS recovery outperforms that of MM-DBMS.<>
![[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software Track](/Content/css/sci/img/zetp.jpg)
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
