31第92条及其后各条。GG:法学

Bumke Christian, Voßkuhle Andreas
{"title":"31第92条及其后各条。GG:法学","authors":"Bumke Christian, Voßkuhle Andreas","doi":"10.1093/LAW/9780198808091.003.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the position of the Federal Constitutional Court with regard to judicial power, taking into account the relevant provisions of Art. 92 et seq. of the Grundgesetz (GG). In particular, it examines those aspects which cast light on the distinctive position of constitutional jurisprudence within the overall framework of judicial power. To this end, the chapter analyses the Court's jurisprudence, citing an instance in which it used a constitutional complaint concerning tax notices and penalties to address the concept of ‘judicial power’. It also considers a 2001 ruling by the Court, which added a functional element to the concept of the judicial power in a case involving the Election Review Court; the legal position of judges, which the Court describes as having three pillars — ‘objective independence’, ‘personal independence’, and ‘organisational independence’; and the Court's emphasis on the importance and substance of the right to a lawful judge.","PeriodicalId":335867,"journal":{"name":"German Constitutional Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"31 Art. 92 et seq. GG: Jurisprudence\",\"authors\":\"Bumke Christian, Voßkuhle Andreas\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/LAW/9780198808091.003.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter discusses the position of the Federal Constitutional Court with regard to judicial power, taking into account the relevant provisions of Art. 92 et seq. of the Grundgesetz (GG). In particular, it examines those aspects which cast light on the distinctive position of constitutional jurisprudence within the overall framework of judicial power. To this end, the chapter analyses the Court's jurisprudence, citing an instance in which it used a constitutional complaint concerning tax notices and penalties to address the concept of ‘judicial power’. It also considers a 2001 ruling by the Court, which added a functional element to the concept of the judicial power in a case involving the Election Review Court; the legal position of judges, which the Court describes as having three pillars — ‘objective independence’, ‘personal independence’, and ‘organisational independence’; and the Court's emphasis on the importance and substance of the right to a lawful judge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Constitutional Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Constitutional Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/LAW/9780198808091.003.0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LAW/9780198808091.003.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章讨论联邦宪法法院在司法权方面的立场,同时考虑到第92条及其后各条的有关规定。Grundgesetz (GG)。特别是,它考察了那些能够阐明宪法学在司法权总体框架内的独特地位的方面。为此,本章分析了法院的判例,引用了一个案例,其中法院使用了关于税收通知和处罚的宪法申诉来解决“司法权”的概念。它还审议了法院2001年的一项裁决,该裁决在涉及选举审查法院的案件中为司法权的概念增加了一个功能因素;法官的法律地位,法院将其描述为三个支柱——“客观独立”、“个人独立”和“组织独立”;以及法院对合法法官权利的重要性和实质的强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
31 Art. 92 et seq. GG: Jurisprudence
This chapter discusses the position of the Federal Constitutional Court with regard to judicial power, taking into account the relevant provisions of Art. 92 et seq. of the Grundgesetz (GG). In particular, it examines those aspects which cast light on the distinctive position of constitutional jurisprudence within the overall framework of judicial power. To this end, the chapter analyses the Court's jurisprudence, citing an instance in which it used a constitutional complaint concerning tax notices and penalties to address the concept of ‘judicial power’. It also considers a 2001 ruling by the Court, which added a functional element to the concept of the judicial power in a case involving the Election Review Court; the legal position of judges, which the Court describes as having three pillars — ‘objective independence’, ‘personal independence’, and ‘organisational independence’; and the Court's emphasis on the importance and substance of the right to a lawful judge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信