{"title":"样本方差的几个性质","authors":"E. Benhamou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3247547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A basic result is that the sample variance for i.i.d. observations is an unbiased estimator of the variance of the underlying distribution (see for instance Casella and Berger (2002)). Another result is that the sample variance 's variance is minimum compared to any other unbiased estimators (see Halmos (1946)). But what happens if the observations are neither independent nor identically distributed. What can we say? Can we in particular compute explicitly the first two moments of the sample mean and hence generalize formulae provided in Tukey (1957a), Tukey (1957b) for the first two moments of the sample variance? We also know that the sample mean and variance are independent if they are computed on an i.i.d. normal distribution. This is one of the underlying assumption to derive the Student distribution Student alias W. S. Gosset (1908). But does this result hold for any other underlying distribution? Can we still have independent sample mean and variance if the distribution is not normal? This paper precisely answers these questions and extends previous work of Cho, Cho, and Eltinge (2004). We are able to derive a general formula for the first two moments and variance of the sample variance under no specific assumptions. We also provide a faster proof of a seminal result of Lukacs (1942) by using the log characteristic function of the unbiased sample variance estimator.","PeriodicalId":365899,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Few Properties of Sample Variance\",\"authors\":\"E. Benhamou\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3247547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A basic result is that the sample variance for i.i.d. observations is an unbiased estimator of the variance of the underlying distribution (see for instance Casella and Berger (2002)). Another result is that the sample variance 's variance is minimum compared to any other unbiased estimators (see Halmos (1946)). But what happens if the observations are neither independent nor identically distributed. What can we say? Can we in particular compute explicitly the first two moments of the sample mean and hence generalize formulae provided in Tukey (1957a), Tukey (1957b) for the first two moments of the sample variance? We also know that the sample mean and variance are independent if they are computed on an i.i.d. normal distribution. This is one of the underlying assumption to derive the Student distribution Student alias W. S. Gosset (1908). But does this result hold for any other underlying distribution? Can we still have independent sample mean and variance if the distribution is not normal? This paper precisely answers these questions and extends previous work of Cho, Cho, and Eltinge (2004). We are able to derive a general formula for the first two moments and variance of the sample variance under no specific assumptions. We also provide a faster proof of a seminal result of Lukacs (1942) by using the log characteristic function of the unbiased sample variance estimator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3247547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3247547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
一个基本的结果是,i.i.d观察的样本方差是潜在分布方差的无偏估计量(例如参见Casella和Berger(2002))。另一个结果是,与任何其他无偏估计量相比,样本方差的方差是最小的(见Halmos(1946))。但是如果观察结果既不是独立的也不是同分布的呢?我们能说什么呢?我们是否可以特别明确地计算样本均值的前两个矩,从而推广Tukey (1957a), Tukey (1957b)中提供的样本方差的前两个矩的公式?我们还知道,如果样本均值和方差是在正态分布上计算的,那么它们是独立的。这是推导学生分布的基本假设之一,学生别名W. S. Gosset(1908)。但是这个结果是否也适用于其他潜在的分布呢?如果分布不是正态分布,我们还能有独立样本均值和方差吗?本文准确地回答了这些问题,并扩展了Cho, Cho和Eltinge(2004)之前的工作。我们能够在没有特定假设的情况下推导出样本方差的前两个矩和方差的一般公式。我们还通过使用无偏样本方差估计器的对数特征函数,提供了卢卡奇(1942)的一个开创性结果的更快证明。
A basic result is that the sample variance for i.i.d. observations is an unbiased estimator of the variance of the underlying distribution (see for instance Casella and Berger (2002)). Another result is that the sample variance 's variance is minimum compared to any other unbiased estimators (see Halmos (1946)). But what happens if the observations are neither independent nor identically distributed. What can we say? Can we in particular compute explicitly the first two moments of the sample mean and hence generalize formulae provided in Tukey (1957a), Tukey (1957b) for the first two moments of the sample variance? We also know that the sample mean and variance are independent if they are computed on an i.i.d. normal distribution. This is one of the underlying assumption to derive the Student distribution Student alias W. S. Gosset (1908). But does this result hold for any other underlying distribution? Can we still have independent sample mean and variance if the distribution is not normal? This paper precisely answers these questions and extends previous work of Cho, Cho, and Eltinge (2004). We are able to derive a general formula for the first two moments and variance of the sample variance under no specific assumptions. We also provide a faster proof of a seminal result of Lukacs (1942) by using the log characteristic function of the unbiased sample variance estimator.