媒体对gibrankaesang腐败指控的态度

Avant Garde Pub Date : 2022-06-25 DOI:10.36080/ag.v10i1.1680
I. Suryawati, Titi Widaningsih
{"title":"媒体对gibrankaesang腐败指控的态度","authors":"I. Suryawati, Titi Widaningsih","doi":"10.36080/ag.v10i1.1680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reports of alleged corruption cases Gibran-Kaesang to the KPK have attracted the attention of online media. Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id are news portals that consider this important issue. The purpose of this study is to explain Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi, co.id attitude in reporting the Gibran-Kaesang corruption alleged report and to uncover the form of domination in the news. The method used is Robert N. Entman framing model. The paradigm used is the constructive paradigm. The object of research is the reporting of alleged corruption by Gibran-Kaesang on Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id during the period from January 10, 2022 to January 21, 2022. The results show that Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id construction is presented differently. Kompas.com constructs this reality from the political aspect, while Wartaekonomi.co.id from the political and legal aspects. Kompas.com tends to be neutral. Unlike the case with Wartaekonomi.co.id, which is more daring to be against it. Kompas.com does not highlight certain images in its reporting. In fact, Wartaekonomi.co.id highlighted Ubedillah's positive image and created a negative image of Gibran. Wartaekonomi.co.id seems to position its news portal as an alternative media that forms an alternative public space, namely a room for protest and critical politics, even though it is not maximized.","PeriodicalId":241807,"journal":{"name":"Avant Garde","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sikap Media Dalam Kasus Dugaan Korupsi Gibran-Kaesang\",\"authors\":\"I. Suryawati, Titi Widaningsih\",\"doi\":\"10.36080/ag.v10i1.1680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reports of alleged corruption cases Gibran-Kaesang to the KPK have attracted the attention of online media. Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id are news portals that consider this important issue. The purpose of this study is to explain Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi, co.id attitude in reporting the Gibran-Kaesang corruption alleged report and to uncover the form of domination in the news. The method used is Robert N. Entman framing model. The paradigm used is the constructive paradigm. The object of research is the reporting of alleged corruption by Gibran-Kaesang on Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id during the period from January 10, 2022 to January 21, 2022. The results show that Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id construction is presented differently. Kompas.com constructs this reality from the political aspect, while Wartaekonomi.co.id from the political and legal aspects. Kompas.com tends to be neutral. Unlike the case with Wartaekonomi.co.id, which is more daring to be against it. Kompas.com does not highlight certain images in its reporting. In fact, Wartaekonomi.co.id highlighted Ubedillah's positive image and created a negative image of Gibran. Wartaekonomi.co.id seems to position its news portal as an alternative media that forms an alternative public space, namely a room for protest and critical politics, even though it is not maximized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":241807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avant Garde\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avant Garde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36080/ag.v10i1.1680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avant Garde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36080/ag.v10i1.1680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

giran - kaesang涉嫌贪污案件的报道引起了网络媒体的关注。Kompas.com和Wartaekonomi.co.id是考虑到这个重要问题的新闻门户网站。本研究的目的是解释Kompas.com和Wartaekonomi, co.在报道gibranan - kaesang腐败指控报告中的态度,并揭示新闻中的统治形式。所采用的方法是Robert N. Entman框架模型。所使用的范式是建设性范式。研究对象是在2022年1月10日至1月21日期间,在Kompas.com和wartaekonomi .co.上报道的gibrankaesang的腐败嫌疑。结果表明,Kompas.com和wartaekonomi .co.的结构呈现不同。Kompas.com从政治方面构建了这种现实,而wartaekonomi .co.则从政治和法律方面构建了这种现实。Kompas.com倾向于保持中立。与wartaekonomicco的情况不同。我更敢于反对它。Kompas.com在其报道中不会突出显示某些图片。事实上,Wartaekonomi.co.id突出了Ubedillah的正面形象,并创造了纪伯伦的负面形象。“Wartaekonomi.co.id”虽然没有最大化,但似乎将其新闻门户定位为形成抗议和批判政治空间等另类公共空间的另类媒体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sikap Media Dalam Kasus Dugaan Korupsi Gibran-Kaesang
Reports of alleged corruption cases Gibran-Kaesang to the KPK have attracted the attention of online media. Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id are news portals that consider this important issue. The purpose of this study is to explain Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi, co.id attitude in reporting the Gibran-Kaesang corruption alleged report and to uncover the form of domination in the news. The method used is Robert N. Entman framing model. The paradigm used is the constructive paradigm. The object of research is the reporting of alleged corruption by Gibran-Kaesang on Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id during the period from January 10, 2022 to January 21, 2022. The results show that Kompas.com and Wartaekonomi.co.id construction is presented differently. Kompas.com constructs this reality from the political aspect, while Wartaekonomi.co.id from the political and legal aspects. Kompas.com tends to be neutral. Unlike the case with Wartaekonomi.co.id, which is more daring to be against it. Kompas.com does not highlight certain images in its reporting. In fact, Wartaekonomi.co.id highlighted Ubedillah's positive image and created a negative image of Gibran. Wartaekonomi.co.id seems to position its news portal as an alternative media that forms an alternative public space, namely a room for protest and critical politics, even though it is not maximized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信