数据密集型网格应用的高性能文件传输系统的比较评估

C. Anglano, M. Canonico
{"title":"数据密集型网格应用的高性能文件传输系统的比较评估","authors":"C. Anglano, M. Canonico","doi":"10.1109/ENABL.2004.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability of transferring very large files in the shortest amount of time is crucial for data-intensive grid applications. Experimental evidence has shown that the mere availability of high-capacity wide-area networks is not sufficient to obtain adequate performance if vanilla TCP is used to transport data. Consequently, many alternative solutions are being explored, and a variety of data transfer tools have appeared. In this paper we experimentally compare some of these tools in various network scenarios. Our results show that solutions based on UDP, adopting rate-based algorithms, result in better performance than other alternatives in most cases, while solutions based on TCP are effective only under specific circumstances.","PeriodicalId":391459,"journal":{"name":"13th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative evaluation of high-performance file transfer systems for data-intensive grid applications\",\"authors\":\"C. Anglano, M. Canonico\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ENABL.2004.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ability of transferring very large files in the shortest amount of time is crucial for data-intensive grid applications. Experimental evidence has shown that the mere availability of high-capacity wide-area networks is not sufficient to obtain adequate performance if vanilla TCP is used to transport data. Consequently, many alternative solutions are being explored, and a variety of data transfer tools have appeared. In this paper we experimentally compare some of these tools in various network scenarios. Our results show that solutions based on UDP, adopting rate-based algorithms, result in better performance than other alternatives in most cases, while solutions based on TCP are effective only under specific circumstances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"13th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"13th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.2004.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"13th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.2004.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在最短的时间内传输非常大的文件的能力对于数据密集型网格应用程序至关重要。实验证据表明,如果使用普通TCP传输数据,仅仅可用的大容量广域网不足以获得足够的性能。因此,人们正在探索许多替代解决方案,并出现了各种数据传输工具。在本文中,我们在不同的网络场景中实验比较了这些工具中的一些。我们的结果表明,基于UDP的解决方案,采用基于速率的算法,在大多数情况下比其他替代方案产生更好的性能,而基于TCP的解决方案仅在特定情况下有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative evaluation of high-performance file transfer systems for data-intensive grid applications
The ability of transferring very large files in the shortest amount of time is crucial for data-intensive grid applications. Experimental evidence has shown that the mere availability of high-capacity wide-area networks is not sufficient to obtain adequate performance if vanilla TCP is used to transport data. Consequently, many alternative solutions are being explored, and a variety of data transfer tools have appeared. In this paper we experimentally compare some of these tools in various network scenarios. Our results show that solutions based on UDP, adopting rate-based algorithms, result in better performance than other alternatives in most cases, while solutions based on TCP are effective only under specific circumstances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信