从LFP中分离LREC

A. Dawar, Felipe Ferreira Santos
{"title":"从LFP中分离LREC","authors":"A. Dawar, Felipe Ferreira Santos","doi":"10.1145/3531130.3533368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"is an extension of first-order logic with a logarithmic recursion operator. It was introduced by Grohe et al. and shown to capture the complexity class L over trees and interval graphs. It does not capture L in general as it is contained in —fixed-point logic with counting. We show that this containment is strict. In particular, we show that the path systems problem, a classic P-complete problem which is definable in —fixed-point logic—is not definable in . This shows that the logarithmic recursion mechanism is provably weaker than general least fixed points.","PeriodicalId":373589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Separating LREC from LFP\",\"authors\":\"A. Dawar, Felipe Ferreira Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3531130.3533368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"is an extension of first-order logic with a logarithmic recursion operator. It was introduced by Grohe et al. and shown to capture the complexity class L over trees and interval graphs. It does not capture L in general as it is contained in —fixed-point logic with counting. We show that this containment is strict. In particular, we show that the path systems problem, a classic P-complete problem which is definable in —fixed-point logic—is not definable in . This shows that the logarithmic recursion mechanism is provably weaker than general least fixed points.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3531130.3533368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3531130.3533368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

是一阶逻辑的扩展,带有对数递归算子。它是由Grohe等人引入的,并被证明可以捕获树和区间图上的复杂度类L。它通常不捕获L,因为它包含在带计数的-定点逻辑中。我们表明这种遏制是严格的。特别地,我们证明了路径系统问题,一个经典的p -完全问题,在-不动点逻辑中可定义,在-不动点逻辑中不可定义。这表明对数递推机制比一般最小不动点机制弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Separating LREC from LFP
is an extension of first-order logic with a logarithmic recursion operator. It was introduced by Grohe et al. and shown to capture the complexity class L over trees and interval graphs. It does not capture L in general as it is contained in —fixed-point logic with counting. We show that this containment is strict. In particular, we show that the path systems problem, a classic P-complete problem which is definable in —fixed-point logic—is not definable in . This shows that the logarithmic recursion mechanism is provably weaker than general least fixed points.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信