“诉求”的概念

Caroline Naômé
{"title":"“诉求”的概念","authors":"Caroline Naômé","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198826255.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The appeal is a form of action by which a party claims that the Court of Justice should set aside a decision of the General Court for infringement of a rule of law. It must be directed against a decision of the GCEU. In the context of the ECJ and its case-law, it is difficult to identify what constitutes a ‘decision’ of the General Court. The object of the appeal must be the setting aside of that decision and not a re-assessment of the substantive issue, a decision on a new claim or an amendment of the grounds of the decision. The appellant must submit a criticism of the decision under appeal. Accordingly, a new plea relating to the substance of the dispute is inadmissible, unless it concerns a matter of public policy. The Court of Justice does not review assessments of fact made by the General Court.","PeriodicalId":433818,"journal":{"name":"Appeals Before the Court of Justice of the European Union","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of an ‘Appeal’\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Naômé\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198826255.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The appeal is a form of action by which a party claims that the Court of Justice should set aside a decision of the General Court for infringement of a rule of law. It must be directed against a decision of the GCEU. In the context of the ECJ and its case-law, it is difficult to identify what constitutes a ‘decision’ of the General Court. The object of the appeal must be the setting aside of that decision and not a re-assessment of the substantive issue, a decision on a new claim or an amendment of the grounds of the decision. The appellant must submit a criticism of the decision under appeal. Accordingly, a new plea relating to the substance of the dispute is inadmissible, unless it concerns a matter of public policy. The Court of Justice does not review assessments of fact made by the General Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appeals Before the Court of Justice of the European Union\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appeals Before the Court of Justice of the European Union\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826255.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appeals Before the Court of Justice of the European Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826255.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上诉是一种诉讼形式,当事人要求法院撤销普通法院对违反法治的裁决。它必须针对GCEU的决定。在欧洲法院及其判例法的背景下,很难确定什么构成普通法院的“决定”。上诉的目的必须是撤销该决定,而不是重新评估实质性问题、就新的要求作出决定或修正该决定的理由。上诉人必须对上诉决定提出批评。因此,除非涉及公共政策问题,否则与争端实质有关的新抗辩不予受理。法院不审查普通法院对事实作出的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Concept of an ‘Appeal’
The appeal is a form of action by which a party claims that the Court of Justice should set aside a decision of the General Court for infringement of a rule of law. It must be directed against a decision of the GCEU. In the context of the ECJ and its case-law, it is difficult to identify what constitutes a ‘decision’ of the General Court. The object of the appeal must be the setting aside of that decision and not a re-assessment of the substantive issue, a decision on a new claim or an amendment of the grounds of the decision. The appellant must submit a criticism of the decision under appeal. Accordingly, a new plea relating to the substance of the dispute is inadmissible, unless it concerns a matter of public policy. The Court of Justice does not review assessments of fact made by the General Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信