软件过程改进背景下敏捷评估方法的可信度

Célio Santana, C. Gusmão, D. Caetano, A. Vasconcelos
{"title":"软件过程改进背景下敏捷评估方法的可信度","authors":"Célio Santana, C. Gusmão, D. Caetano, A. Vasconcelos","doi":"10.1109/AGILE.2011.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"with the advent of CMMI in the late 1990s, software companies tried to use a kind of score to rank themselves in the market. Being a CMMI level five company for a long time represented the epitome of highly qualified company. This phenomenon is also emerging in the agile software development with the emergence of methods such as Nokia or comparative test agility. This paper presents an analysis of how these methods are placed in the context of agile software development and its contribution to the improvement of software process in the same context from a case study developed in real companies.","PeriodicalId":133654,"journal":{"name":"2011 AGILE Conference","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Confidence of Agile Assessment Methods in the Context of Software Process Improvement\",\"authors\":\"Célio Santana, C. Gusmão, D. Caetano, A. Vasconcelos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AGILE.2011.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"with the advent of CMMI in the late 1990s, software companies tried to use a kind of score to rank themselves in the market. Being a CMMI level five company for a long time represented the epitome of highly qualified company. This phenomenon is also emerging in the agile software development with the emergence of methods such as Nokia or comparative test agility. This paper presents an analysis of how these methods are placed in the context of agile software development and its contribution to the improvement of software process in the same context from a case study developed in real companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 AGILE Conference\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 AGILE Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2011.38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 AGILE Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2011.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着20世纪90年代末CMMI的出现,软件公司试图用一种分数来给自己在市场上排名。长期作为CMMI五级企业代表着高质量企业的缩影。随着诺基亚或比较测试敏捷等方法的出现,这种现象也出现在敏捷软件开发中。本文分析了这些方法是如何在敏捷软件开发的背景下进行的,并从实际公司中开发的案例研究中分析了这些方法对相同背景下软件过程改进的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Confidence of Agile Assessment Methods in the Context of Software Process Improvement
with the advent of CMMI in the late 1990s, software companies tried to use a kind of score to rank themselves in the market. Being a CMMI level five company for a long time represented the epitome of highly qualified company. This phenomenon is also emerging in the agile software development with the emergence of methods such as Nokia or comparative test agility. This paper presents an analysis of how these methods are placed in the context of agile software development and its contribution to the improvement of software process in the same context from a case study developed in real companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信