{"title":"相反证据:腐败犯罪的理论研究","authors":"A. Samosir","doi":"10.33019/progresif.v11i1.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of reversing the burden of proof from the perspective of legislation policy is known in the criminal act of corruption as a \"premium remediation\" provision and also contains a special prevention. The criminal act of corruption as \"extra ordinary crimes that require extra ordinary enforcement and extra ordinary measures\", then crucial aspects in cases of corruption is the effort to fulfill the burden of proof in the process by law enforcement officers.","PeriodicalId":448451,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK: SUATU KAJIAN TEORETIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI\",\"authors\":\"A. Samosir\",\"doi\":\"10.33019/progresif.v11i1.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existence of reversing the burden of proof from the perspective of legislation policy is known in the criminal act of corruption as a \\\"premium remediation\\\" provision and also contains a special prevention. The criminal act of corruption as \\\"extra ordinary crimes that require extra ordinary enforcement and extra ordinary measures\\\", then crucial aspects in cases of corruption is the effort to fulfill the burden of proof in the process by law enforcement officers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v11i1.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v11i1.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK: SUATU KAJIAN TEORETIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
The existence of reversing the burden of proof from the perspective of legislation policy is known in the criminal act of corruption as a "premium remediation" provision and also contains a special prevention. The criminal act of corruption as "extra ordinary crimes that require extra ordinary enforcement and extra ordinary measures", then crucial aspects in cases of corruption is the effort to fulfill the burden of proof in the process by law enforcement officers.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
