真理的司法途径

M. Lupu
{"title":"真理的司法途径","authors":"M. Lupu","doi":"10.18662/jls/34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding the truth is considered by many people envolved in a lawsuit as the ideal of justice, beyond punishing those who are guilty for committing crimes, the obligation to recognize the subjective rights’ violation or the compensation for damages. In certain situations, a partial truth becomes similar to injustice. The legislators have turned the finding of truth into a fundamental principle of law, quite abstract in comparison to formal, direct norms, with provisions that require a minimum margin of interpretation. Taken in this formalism, law scholars, judges and lawyers, especially after a long period of time, may no longer relate to fundamental values, including the finding of truth. The compromised truth leads to a misapplication of the law and, implicitly, to a vicious court decision on litigation. One af the arised question is whether the legislator himself should be mindful of the truth in the law-making process. The approaches may be diverse: substantiation of norms, simplification of procedures, systematization of law towards the predictable and understandable solution to legal conflicts.","PeriodicalId":106812,"journal":{"name":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Juridical Approach of Truth\",\"authors\":\"M. Lupu\",\"doi\":\"10.18662/jls/34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finding the truth is considered by many people envolved in a lawsuit as the ideal of justice, beyond punishing those who are guilty for committing crimes, the obligation to recognize the subjective rights’ violation or the compensation for damages. In certain situations, a partial truth becomes similar to injustice. The legislators have turned the finding of truth into a fundamental principle of law, quite abstract in comparison to formal, direct norms, with provisions that require a minimum margin of interpretation. Taken in this formalism, law scholars, judges and lawyers, especially after a long period of time, may no longer relate to fundamental values, including the finding of truth. The compromised truth leads to a misapplication of the law and, implicitly, to a vicious court decision on litigation. One af the arised question is whether the legislator himself should be mindful of the truth in the law-making process. The approaches may be diverse: substantiation of norms, simplification of procedures, systematization of law towards the predictable and understandable solution to legal conflicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多诉讼当事人看来,除了惩罚犯罪的人、承认侵犯主观权利的义务和损害赔偿之外,寻找真相是正义的理想。在某些情况下,部分真理变得类似于不公正。立法者已经把真理的发现变成了一项基本的法律原则,与正式的、直接的规范相比,这一原则相当抽象,其规定需要最低限度的解释余地。按照这种形式主义,法律学者、法官和律师,特别是经过很长一段时间后,可能不再涉及包括发现真理在内的基本价值。对真相的妥协导致了对法律的误用,并隐含地导致了法院对诉讼的恶性判决。由此产生的一个问题是,立法者自己是否应该在立法过程中注意真相。方法可以是多种多样的:规范的实体化,程序的简化,法律的系统化,以可预测和可理解的方式解决法律冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Juridical Approach of Truth
Finding the truth is considered by many people envolved in a lawsuit as the ideal of justice, beyond punishing those who are guilty for committing crimes, the obligation to recognize the subjective rights’ violation or the compensation for damages. In certain situations, a partial truth becomes similar to injustice. The legislators have turned the finding of truth into a fundamental principle of law, quite abstract in comparison to formal, direct norms, with provisions that require a minimum margin of interpretation. Taken in this formalism, law scholars, judges and lawyers, especially after a long period of time, may no longer relate to fundamental values, including the finding of truth. The compromised truth leads to a misapplication of the law and, implicitly, to a vicious court decision on litigation. One af the arised question is whether the legislator himself should be mindful of the truth in the law-making process. The approaches may be diverse: substantiation of norms, simplification of procedures, systematization of law towards the predictable and understandable solution to legal conflicts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信