住宅社会设施效率及生产力评估

Izabela Ertingerová
{"title":"住宅社会设施效率及生产力评估","authors":"Izabela Ertingerová","doi":"10.18267/J.CFUC.511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on evaluation of the technical effectiveness of 33 specific social facilities (retirement homes), using the basic DEA (CCR and VCC) models and Malquist Index for a specific timeframe of 2011 to 2016. The main focus when selecting the retirement homes was to have the means to compare them to one another. To evaluate the effectiveness we’ve created a model that works with four inputs and two outputs. The inputs: Number of beds per one employee, wage per employee (thousands of CZK), number of beds per one employee in direct care and finally a cost per bed (thousands of CZK). The outputs: The income per bed (thousands of CZK) and a number of transfers per bed (thousands of CZK). The results show that the number of total effective retirement homes in the input-oriented model in 2011 was 57.57% in case of VRS and 24.26% in case of CRS. The input-oriented model proved the effectivity at 57.58% of cases when assuming the CTS and 24.25% when assuming the CRS. In 2016 the number of effectively functioning retirement homes in input-output model was 51.51% in case of VRS and 27.27% in case of CRS.","PeriodicalId":406905,"journal":{"name":"Český finanční a účetní časopis","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of efficiency and productivity of the residential social facilities\",\"authors\":\"Izabela Ertingerová\",\"doi\":\"10.18267/J.CFUC.511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article focuses on evaluation of the technical effectiveness of 33 specific social facilities (retirement homes), using the basic DEA (CCR and VCC) models and Malquist Index for a specific timeframe of 2011 to 2016. The main focus when selecting the retirement homes was to have the means to compare them to one another. To evaluate the effectiveness we’ve created a model that works with four inputs and two outputs. The inputs: Number of beds per one employee, wage per employee (thousands of CZK), number of beds per one employee in direct care and finally a cost per bed (thousands of CZK). The outputs: The income per bed (thousands of CZK) and a number of transfers per bed (thousands of CZK). The results show that the number of total effective retirement homes in the input-oriented model in 2011 was 57.57% in case of VRS and 24.26% in case of CRS. The input-oriented model proved the effectivity at 57.58% of cases when assuming the CTS and 24.25% when assuming the CRS. In 2016 the number of effectively functioning retirement homes in input-output model was 51.51% in case of VRS and 27.27% in case of CRS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Český finanční a účetní časopis\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Český finanční a účetní časopis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18267/J.CFUC.511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Český finanční a účetní časopis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/J.CFUC.511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文采用基本DEA (CCR和VCC)模型和Malquist指数对2011 - 2016年的33个特定社会设施(养老院)进行了技术有效性评价。在选择养老院时,主要关注的是有办法将它们相互比较。为了评估有效性,我们创建了一个具有四个输入和两个输出的模型。输入:每位员工的床位数,每位员工的工资(数千捷克克朗),每位直接护理员工的床位数,最后是每张病床的成本(数千捷克克朗)。输出:每张床的收入(千捷克克朗)和每张床的转送次数(千捷克克朗)。结果表明,2011年投入导向模式下,VRS有效养老院总数为57.57%,CRS有效养老院总数为24.26%。在假设CTS和CRS时,输入导向模型的有效性分别为57.58%和24.25%。2016年投入产出模式下有效运行的养老院数量,VRS为51.51%,CRS为27.27%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of efficiency and productivity of the residential social facilities
The article focuses on evaluation of the technical effectiveness of 33 specific social facilities (retirement homes), using the basic DEA (CCR and VCC) models and Malquist Index for a specific timeframe of 2011 to 2016. The main focus when selecting the retirement homes was to have the means to compare them to one another. To evaluate the effectiveness we’ve created a model that works with four inputs and two outputs. The inputs: Number of beds per one employee, wage per employee (thousands of CZK), number of beds per one employee in direct care and finally a cost per bed (thousands of CZK). The outputs: The income per bed (thousands of CZK) and a number of transfers per bed (thousands of CZK). The results show that the number of total effective retirement homes in the input-oriented model in 2011 was 57.57% in case of VRS and 24.26% in case of CRS. The input-oriented model proved the effectivity at 57.58% of cases when assuming the CTS and 24.25% when assuming the CRS. In 2016 the number of effectively functioning retirement homes in input-output model was 51.51% in case of VRS and 27.27% in case of CRS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信