固体废物管理概念选择的多标准分析——以查亚普拉森塔尼湖地区农村为例

Alfred Benjamin Alfons, Tri Padmi
{"title":"固体废物管理概念选择的多标准分析——以查亚普拉森塔尼湖地区农村为例","authors":"Alfred Benjamin Alfons, Tri Padmi","doi":"10.25105/URBANENVIROTECH.V2I1.3557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to identify, develop, and determine the most suitable concept of solid waste management to be applied in Ifale Village, Yobeh Village, Putali Village, Atamali Village, and Asei Besar Village. Until now, the application of solid waste management system in Jayapura is still far from what people expected since it has been unable to serve the communities who live in rural areas on the islands around Sentani Lake. As a result, 12,554.38 liters/day of solid waste generated by the community in these regions is left untreated. Methodology and Results: The study is using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The AHP calculations show that the idea of handling solid waste in an integrated treatment facility—following the initial sorting on the household scale—has the highest priority weight (2.05) compared to the other alternatives. Hence, it has been chosen as the best solid waste management concept that can be applied to the study sites. Based on the results as well, the main criteria to be considered include the environmental aspects, social aspects, and technical aspects with each weighing value of 0.534, 0.186, and 0.147, respectively. Conclution, significans and impact study:  The sub-criteria with the highest priorities to be considered in making the decision are the soil pollution (due to produced leachate), air pollution (potentially in the form of stench and gas emissions), the transmission of disease vectors, public participation, and the operational convenience.","PeriodicalId":329428,"journal":{"name":"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Criteria Analysis for Selecting Solid Waste Management Concept Case Study: Rural Areas in Sentani Lake Region, Jayapura\",\"authors\":\"Alfred Benjamin Alfons, Tri Padmi\",\"doi\":\"10.25105/URBANENVIROTECH.V2I1.3557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study aims to identify, develop, and determine the most suitable concept of solid waste management to be applied in Ifale Village, Yobeh Village, Putali Village, Atamali Village, and Asei Besar Village. Until now, the application of solid waste management system in Jayapura is still far from what people expected since it has been unable to serve the communities who live in rural areas on the islands around Sentani Lake. As a result, 12,554.38 liters/day of solid waste generated by the community in these regions is left untreated. Methodology and Results: The study is using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The AHP calculations show that the idea of handling solid waste in an integrated treatment facility—following the initial sorting on the household scale—has the highest priority weight (2.05) compared to the other alternatives. Hence, it has been chosen as the best solid waste management concept that can be applied to the study sites. Based on the results as well, the main criteria to be considered include the environmental aspects, social aspects, and technical aspects with each weighing value of 0.534, 0.186, and 0.147, respectively. Conclution, significans and impact study:  The sub-criteria with the highest priorities to be considered in making the decision are the soil pollution (due to produced leachate), air pollution (potentially in the form of stench and gas emissions), the transmission of disease vectors, public participation, and the operational convenience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25105/URBANENVIROTECH.V2I1.3557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/URBANENVIROTECH.V2I1.3557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定、发展和确定最适合在Ifale村、Yobeh村、Putali村、Atamali村和Asei Besar村应用的固体废物管理概念。到目前为止,固体废物管理系统在Jayapura的应用还远远没有达到人们的期望,因为它无法服务于Sentani湖周围岛屿上农村地区的社区。结果,这些地区的社区每天产生的12554.38升固体废物没有得到处理。方法与结果:本研究采用层次分析法(AHP)。AHP计算表明,在家庭规模的初始分类之后,在综合处理设施中处理固体废物的想法与其他替代方案相比具有最高的优先权重(2.05)。因此,它被选为可应用于研究地点的最佳固体废物管理概念。根据结果,需要考虑的主要标准包括环境方面、社会方面和技术方面,每个权重值分别为0.534、0.186和0.147。结论、意义和影响研究:在作出决定时应优先考虑的子标准是土壤污染(由于产生的渗滤液)、空气污染(可能以恶臭和气体排放的形式)、病媒传播、公众参与和操作便利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-Criteria Analysis for Selecting Solid Waste Management Concept Case Study: Rural Areas in Sentani Lake Region, Jayapura
Aim: This study aims to identify, develop, and determine the most suitable concept of solid waste management to be applied in Ifale Village, Yobeh Village, Putali Village, Atamali Village, and Asei Besar Village. Until now, the application of solid waste management system in Jayapura is still far from what people expected since it has been unable to serve the communities who live in rural areas on the islands around Sentani Lake. As a result, 12,554.38 liters/day of solid waste generated by the community in these regions is left untreated. Methodology and Results: The study is using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The AHP calculations show that the idea of handling solid waste in an integrated treatment facility—following the initial sorting on the household scale—has the highest priority weight (2.05) compared to the other alternatives. Hence, it has been chosen as the best solid waste management concept that can be applied to the study sites. Based on the results as well, the main criteria to be considered include the environmental aspects, social aspects, and technical aspects with each weighing value of 0.534, 0.186, and 0.147, respectively. Conclution, significans and impact study:  The sub-criteria with the highest priorities to be considered in making the decision are the soil pollution (due to produced leachate), air pollution (potentially in the form of stench and gas emissions), the transmission of disease vectors, public participation, and the operational convenience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信