学生的数学成绩在七年级范希勒几何水平上有所不同

Azwar Anwar
{"title":"学生的数学成绩在七年级范希勒几何水平上有所不同","authors":"Azwar Anwar","doi":"10.29303/mandalika.v1i2.1536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the distribution of student geometry levels based on Van Hiele's theory and find out the differences in students' mathematics learning outcomes in grade VII junior high school. The sampling technique is probability sampling and a sample of 182 students is obtained. Data collection techniques used were Van Hiele level geometry tests and test results. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and anova with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that only 170 students were included in the Van Hiele geometry level, namely 62 students were at level 0, 97 students were at level 1, 5 students were at level 2, and as many as 6 students are at level 3. In the inferential analysis based on analysis of variance (two-way anova) concludes that for learning outcomes based on Van Hiele level geometry obtained Fcount = 13.793 > Ftable = 9.28 means H0 is rejected means that there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes based on Van Hiele geometry level.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui distribusi level geometri siswa berdasarkan teori Van Hiele dan mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa di kelas VII SMP. Menggunakan teknik probability sampling dan diperoleh sampel sebanyak 182 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes level geometri Van Hiele dan tes hasil belajar. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan anova dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 5%. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dari 182 sampel, hanya 170 siswa yang termasuk dalam level geometri Van Hiele yaitu 62 siswa berada pada level 0, sebanyak 97 siswa pada level 1, sebanyak 5 siswa pada level 2, dan  6 siswa pada level 3. Analisis anova dua arah diperoleh Fhitung = 13,793 > Ftabel = 9,28 berarti H0  ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika berdasarkan level geometri Van Hiele.","PeriodicalId":178880,"journal":{"name":"Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa ditinjau dari Level Geometri Van Hiele SMP Kelas VII\",\"authors\":\"Azwar Anwar\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/mandalika.v1i2.1536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the distribution of student geometry levels based on Van Hiele's theory and find out the differences in students' mathematics learning outcomes in grade VII junior high school. The sampling technique is probability sampling and a sample of 182 students is obtained. Data collection techniques used were Van Hiele level geometry tests and test results. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and anova with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that only 170 students were included in the Van Hiele geometry level, namely 62 students were at level 0, 97 students were at level 1, 5 students were at level 2, and as many as 6 students are at level 3. In the inferential analysis based on analysis of variance (two-way anova) concludes that for learning outcomes based on Van Hiele level geometry obtained Fcount = 13.793 > Ftable = 9.28 means H0 is rejected means that there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes based on Van Hiele geometry level.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui distribusi level geometri siswa berdasarkan teori Van Hiele dan mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa di kelas VII SMP. Menggunakan teknik probability sampling dan diperoleh sampel sebanyak 182 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes level geometri Van Hiele dan tes hasil belajar. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan anova dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 5%. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dari 182 sampel, hanya 170 siswa yang termasuk dalam level geometri Van Hiele yaitu 62 siswa berada pada level 0, sebanyak 97 siswa pada level 1, sebanyak 5 siswa pada level 2, dan  6 siswa pada level 3. Analisis anova dua arah diperoleh Fhitung = 13,793 > Ftabel = 9,28 berarti H0  ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika berdasarkan level geometri Van Hiele.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/mandalika.v1i2.1536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/mandalika.v1i2.1536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在根据Van Hiele理论确定学生几何水平的分布,并找出初七年级学生数学学习成果的差异。抽样方法为概率抽样,共抽样182名学生。使用的数据收集技术是范海勒水平几何测试和测试结果。数据分析采用描述性统计和方差分析,显著性水平为5%。结果表明,在Van Hiele几何水平中,只有170名学生被纳入,其中62名学生为0级,97名学生为1级,5名学生为2级,多达6名学生为3级。在基于方差分析(双向方差分析)的推理分析中得出结论,对于基于Van Hiele几何水平的学习结果,得到Fcount = 13.793 > Ftable = 9.28意味着H0被拒绝,意味着基于Van Hiele几何水平的数学学习结果存在差异。[摘要]penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui分布,水平几何,siswa bergetahui分布,Van Hiele dan mengetahui perbedaan和hasil belajar matmatatika siswa di kelas 7 SMP。孟古那坎技术概率抽样和双概率抽样。Teknik pengumpulan数据yang digunakan adalah水平几何Van Hiele和hasil belajar。孟古纳坎统计数据分析显示,孟古纳坎统计数据显示,孟古纳坎统计数据显著高于孟古纳坎统计数据5%。Hasil分析数据menunjukkan bahwa dari 182个样本,hanya 170 siswa yang termasuk dalam水平几何,Van Hiele yaitu 62 siswa berada pada 0级,sebanyak 97 siswa pada 1级,sebanyak 5 siswa pada 2级,dan 6 siswa pada 3级。Van Hiele.分析了一种新的方法,即利用Fhitung = 13,793 > Ftabel = 9,28 berarti H0 ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbeda和hasil belajar matematika berdasarkan水平几何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa ditinjau dari Level Geometri Van Hiele SMP Kelas VII
This study aims to determine the distribution of student geometry levels based on Van Hiele's theory and find out the differences in students' mathematics learning outcomes in grade VII junior high school. The sampling technique is probability sampling and a sample of 182 students is obtained. Data collection techniques used were Van Hiele level geometry tests and test results. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and anova with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that only 170 students were included in the Van Hiele geometry level, namely 62 students were at level 0, 97 students were at level 1, 5 students were at level 2, and as many as 6 students are at level 3. In the inferential analysis based on analysis of variance (two-way anova) concludes that for learning outcomes based on Van Hiele level geometry obtained Fcount = 13.793 > Ftable = 9.28 means H0 is rejected means that there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes based on Van Hiele geometry level.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui distribusi level geometri siswa berdasarkan teori Van Hiele dan mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa di kelas VII SMP. Menggunakan teknik probability sampling dan diperoleh sampel sebanyak 182 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes level geometri Van Hiele dan tes hasil belajar. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan anova dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 5%. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dari 182 sampel, hanya 170 siswa yang termasuk dalam level geometri Van Hiele yaitu 62 siswa berada pada level 0, sebanyak 97 siswa pada level 1, sebanyak 5 siswa pada level 2, dan  6 siswa pada level 3. Analisis anova dua arah diperoleh Fhitung = 13,793 > Ftabel = 9,28 berarti H0  ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika berdasarkan level geometri Van Hiele.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信