割礼必须取消!

G. Denniston
{"title":"割礼必须取消!","authors":"G. Denniston","doi":"10.47690/swjmid.2019.1101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DISCRIPTION Circumcision has been around for a long time. We have recently reached a stage in human evolution where we are capable of recognizing it for what it is, and doing away with it. Recently the District Court of Cologne, Germany declared in a landmark ruling that anyone who cuts boys foreskins for religious reasons is punishable for causing bodily injury. In its judgment, the Court made clear that neither the rights of the parents nor the freedom of religion guaranteed in Basic Law could justify this intervention. At long last, a judicial entity has called a spade a spade. Circumcision is an assault on the individual, and no one, especially not a doctor, has the right to do this to another person. It constitutes a massive violation of the individual’s basic human rights. A doctor who performs a circumcision in Germany these days can be prosecuted. Why do some individuals insist on doing this to other people? Leaving aside the religious commandment, there is another reason. Someone who has been deprived of half of the skin of his normal penis, with the 20,000 plus sensitive nerve endings, will never experience the joy of sex, as it was meant to be in all mammals for the past 65 million years (all mammals have foreskins). So it should not be surprising to find a deep anger in many a victim. This anger often results in denial, which can manifest as a compulsion to circumcise, or to see to it that others are circumcised. When this tragic relationship generally becomes recognized, steps will be taken to prevent these compulsives from ruining the lives of so many others. To help put this in perspective, let’s compare a pedophile with a circumcising individual. Which is worse, a person who plays with a child’s penis, and harms him psychologically, or a person who tortures (by definition: torture is hurting another, whether intended or not), and permanently mutilates (again, by definition) another human being, and also harms him psychologically? We know how society reacts to a pedophile. How should it react to a circumciser? When the public fully recognizes what is going on, most will want to put an end to the tragic practice. At this very moment, we are in the midst of the greatest scandal in American medical history. The Gates Foundation has given over One Billion dollars to circumcise some 600,000 African males, allegedly to prevent AIDS. Everyone knows that circumcision does not prevent AIDS. America has the highest rate of circumcision in the industrialized world, as well as the highest rate of AIDS. Most of these AIDS victims in America were already circumcised. Circumcision plays no role in preventing AIDS. In fact, it will play a role in increasing the rate of AIDS in Africa. First there will be all the extra cases caused by dirty instruments during the surgery. At present about 30% of African AIDS is caused by doctors who fail to sterilize their instruments. Second, AIDS will increase because there will be less condom use. Men will believe the circumcision protects them, and they will no longer want to wear condoms because their sensitivity is now much decreased. Even if circumcision were to be able to decrease AIDS by 60%, the claim made by the researchers, most everyone would still get AIDS eventually. So it is not an effective preventive. But the real indication of fraud is that the researchers cited relative risk, rather than absolute risk, which makes it seem so much more effective. The absolute risk was only about 1.3%. That might not have gotten them the money to carry out their nefarious scheme. So they cited relative risk at 60%. They wanted that money and they got it. This huge tragedy is a result of the compulsive nature of the victims, stopping at nothing to get others to suffer the same losses they suffered. When people begin to understand what is going on here, circumcision will no longer be tolerated. Article Type: Opinion Article","PeriodicalId":433988,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circumcision Must Go!\",\"authors\":\"G. Denniston\",\"doi\":\"10.47690/swjmid.2019.1101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"DISCRIPTION Circumcision has been around for a long time. We have recently reached a stage in human evolution where we are capable of recognizing it for what it is, and doing away with it. Recently the District Court of Cologne, Germany declared in a landmark ruling that anyone who cuts boys foreskins for religious reasons is punishable for causing bodily injury. In its judgment, the Court made clear that neither the rights of the parents nor the freedom of religion guaranteed in Basic Law could justify this intervention. At long last, a judicial entity has called a spade a spade. Circumcision is an assault on the individual, and no one, especially not a doctor, has the right to do this to another person. It constitutes a massive violation of the individual’s basic human rights. A doctor who performs a circumcision in Germany these days can be prosecuted. Why do some individuals insist on doing this to other people? Leaving aside the religious commandment, there is another reason. Someone who has been deprived of half of the skin of his normal penis, with the 20,000 plus sensitive nerve endings, will never experience the joy of sex, as it was meant to be in all mammals for the past 65 million years (all mammals have foreskins). So it should not be surprising to find a deep anger in many a victim. This anger often results in denial, which can manifest as a compulsion to circumcise, or to see to it that others are circumcised. When this tragic relationship generally becomes recognized, steps will be taken to prevent these compulsives from ruining the lives of so many others. To help put this in perspective, let’s compare a pedophile with a circumcising individual. Which is worse, a person who plays with a child’s penis, and harms him psychologically, or a person who tortures (by definition: torture is hurting another, whether intended or not), and permanently mutilates (again, by definition) another human being, and also harms him psychologically? We know how society reacts to a pedophile. How should it react to a circumciser? When the public fully recognizes what is going on, most will want to put an end to the tragic practice. At this very moment, we are in the midst of the greatest scandal in American medical history. The Gates Foundation has given over One Billion dollars to circumcise some 600,000 African males, allegedly to prevent AIDS. Everyone knows that circumcision does not prevent AIDS. America has the highest rate of circumcision in the industrialized world, as well as the highest rate of AIDS. Most of these AIDS victims in America were already circumcised. Circumcision plays no role in preventing AIDS. In fact, it will play a role in increasing the rate of AIDS in Africa. First there will be all the extra cases caused by dirty instruments during the surgery. At present about 30% of African AIDS is caused by doctors who fail to sterilize their instruments. Second, AIDS will increase because there will be less condom use. Men will believe the circumcision protects them, and they will no longer want to wear condoms because their sensitivity is now much decreased. Even if circumcision were to be able to decrease AIDS by 60%, the claim made by the researchers, most everyone would still get AIDS eventually. So it is not an effective preventive. But the real indication of fraud is that the researchers cited relative risk, rather than absolute risk, which makes it seem so much more effective. The absolute risk was only about 1.3%. That might not have gotten them the money to carry out their nefarious scheme. So they cited relative risk at 60%. They wanted that money and they got it. This huge tragedy is a result of the compulsive nature of the victims, stopping at nothing to get others to suffer the same losses they suffered. When people begin to understand what is going on here, circumcision will no longer be tolerated. Article Type: Opinion Article\",\"PeriodicalId\":433988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCIENCE WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCIENCE WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47690/swjmid.2019.1101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47690/swjmid.2019.1101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包皮环切术已经存在很长时间了。我们最近已经达到了人类进化的一个阶段,我们能够认识到它是什么,并消除它。最近,德国科隆地方法院宣布了一项具有里程碑意义的裁决,即任何因宗教原因切割男孩包皮的人都将因造成身体伤害而受到惩罚。法院在判决书中明确指出,无论是父母的权利,还是《基本法》所保障的宗教自由,都不能作为干预的理由。终于,一个司法机构有话直说了。包皮环切是对个人的侵犯,没有人,尤其是医生,有权对另一个人这样做。它严重侵犯了个人的基本人权。如今在德国,做包皮环切手术的医生可能会被起诉。为什么有些人坚持这样对别人?撇开宗教戒律不谈,还有另一个原因。如果一个人被剥夺了正常阴茎一半的皮肤,以及20,000多个敏感的神经末梢,他将永远不会体验到性的快乐,因为在过去的6500万年里,所有哺乳动物都应该拥有这种快乐(所有哺乳动物都有包皮)。因此,在许多受害者身上发现深深的愤怒也就不足为奇了。这种愤怒常常导致拒绝,这可能表现为强制包皮环切,或者看到别人被包皮环切。当人们普遍认识到这种悲剧性的关系时,就会采取措施,防止这些强迫症毁了这么多人的生活。为了更好地理解这一点,我们来比较一下恋童癖和行割礼的人。哪个更糟糕,是一个玩弄孩子阴茎的人,并在心理上伤害他,还是一个折磨人的人(根据定义:折磨是对他人的伤害,无论是否有意),并且永久地残害(根据定义)另一个人,并在心理上伤害他?我们知道社会对恋童癖的反应。它对包皮环切手术有什么反应?当公众充分认识到正在发生的事情时,大多数人会想要结束这种悲惨的做法。此时此刻,我们正处于美国医学史上最大的丑闻之中。盖茨基金会已经为大约60万非洲男性提供了超过10亿美元的包皮环切手术,据称是为了预防艾滋病。每个人都知道割礼并不能预防艾滋病。美国的包皮环切率是工业化国家中最高的,艾滋病的发病率也是最高的。在美国,大多数艾滋病患者已经割过包皮。包皮环切术对预防艾滋病没有任何作用。事实上,它将在增加非洲艾滋病发病率方面发挥作用。首先是手术过程中脏乱的器械造成的额外病例。目前,大约30%的非洲艾滋病是由于医生没有对医疗器械进行消毒造成的。其次,艾滋病将会增加,因为避孕套的使用将会减少。男性会相信割礼可以保护他们,他们不再想戴避孕套,因为他们的敏感性现在大大降低了。即使包皮环切术能够减少60%的艾滋病,研究人员声称,大多数人最终还是会感染艾滋病。所以它不是一种有效的预防措施。但欺诈的真正迹象是,研究人员引用的是相对风险,而不是绝对风险,这使得它看起来更有效。绝对风险仅为1.3%左右。这可能不会让他们有足够的钱来实施他们的邪恶计划。所以他们说相对风险是60%。他们想要那笔钱,他们得到了。这场巨大的悲剧是受害者强迫性的结果,他们不惜一切代价让其他人遭受与他们同样的损失。当人们开始理解这里发生的事情时,割礼将不再被容忍。文章类型:观点文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Circumcision Must Go!
DISCRIPTION Circumcision has been around for a long time. We have recently reached a stage in human evolution where we are capable of recognizing it for what it is, and doing away with it. Recently the District Court of Cologne, Germany declared in a landmark ruling that anyone who cuts boys foreskins for religious reasons is punishable for causing bodily injury. In its judgment, the Court made clear that neither the rights of the parents nor the freedom of religion guaranteed in Basic Law could justify this intervention. At long last, a judicial entity has called a spade a spade. Circumcision is an assault on the individual, and no one, especially not a doctor, has the right to do this to another person. It constitutes a massive violation of the individual’s basic human rights. A doctor who performs a circumcision in Germany these days can be prosecuted. Why do some individuals insist on doing this to other people? Leaving aside the religious commandment, there is another reason. Someone who has been deprived of half of the skin of his normal penis, with the 20,000 plus sensitive nerve endings, will never experience the joy of sex, as it was meant to be in all mammals for the past 65 million years (all mammals have foreskins). So it should not be surprising to find a deep anger in many a victim. This anger often results in denial, which can manifest as a compulsion to circumcise, or to see to it that others are circumcised. When this tragic relationship generally becomes recognized, steps will be taken to prevent these compulsives from ruining the lives of so many others. To help put this in perspective, let’s compare a pedophile with a circumcising individual. Which is worse, a person who plays with a child’s penis, and harms him psychologically, or a person who tortures (by definition: torture is hurting another, whether intended or not), and permanently mutilates (again, by definition) another human being, and also harms him psychologically? We know how society reacts to a pedophile. How should it react to a circumciser? When the public fully recognizes what is going on, most will want to put an end to the tragic practice. At this very moment, we are in the midst of the greatest scandal in American medical history. The Gates Foundation has given over One Billion dollars to circumcise some 600,000 African males, allegedly to prevent AIDS. Everyone knows that circumcision does not prevent AIDS. America has the highest rate of circumcision in the industrialized world, as well as the highest rate of AIDS. Most of these AIDS victims in America were already circumcised. Circumcision plays no role in preventing AIDS. In fact, it will play a role in increasing the rate of AIDS in Africa. First there will be all the extra cases caused by dirty instruments during the surgery. At present about 30% of African AIDS is caused by doctors who fail to sterilize their instruments. Second, AIDS will increase because there will be less condom use. Men will believe the circumcision protects them, and they will no longer want to wear condoms because their sensitivity is now much decreased. Even if circumcision were to be able to decrease AIDS by 60%, the claim made by the researchers, most everyone would still get AIDS eventually. So it is not an effective preventive. But the real indication of fraud is that the researchers cited relative risk, rather than absolute risk, which makes it seem so much more effective. The absolute risk was only about 1.3%. That might not have gotten them the money to carry out their nefarious scheme. So they cited relative risk at 60%. They wanted that money and they got it. This huge tragedy is a result of the compulsive nature of the victims, stopping at nothing to get others to suffer the same losses they suffered. When people begin to understand what is going on here, circumcision will no longer be tolerated. Article Type: Opinion Article
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信