自主预测方法的选择:检验与展望

Marwin Züfle, A. Bauer, Veronika Lesch, Christian Krupitzer, N. Herbst, Samuel Kounev, V. Curtef
{"title":"自主预测方法的选择:检验与展望","authors":"Marwin Züfle, A. Bauer, Veronika Lesch, Christian Krupitzer, N. Herbst, Samuel Kounev, V. Curtef","doi":"10.1109/ICAC.2019.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proactive adaptation improves the system performance of Autonomic Computing systems as it recognizes adaptation concerns in advance and adapts or prepares adaptation accordingly. To support this, forecasting methods use historical data to predict future system states. According to the \"No-Free-Lunch-Theorem\", there is no general forecasting method that performs best in all scenarios. Usually at design time, expert knowledge is required to decide on the forecasting method based on the anticipated characteristics of the resulting time series data. The uncertainty that results from the gap between design time and runtime for adaptive systems, as well as the environmental uncertainty at runtime, decreases the possibility that a forecasting method chosen at design time can cope with runtime demands. A common approach to tackle this problem is to use recommendation systems that automatically choose the forecasting methods. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for forecasting method selection and a recommendation-based ensemble forecasting approach. We compare our approaches with one of the most widely used recommendation approaches for time series forecasting. Whereas the reference system uses static recommendation rules, we contrast a modified version which supports dynamic rule learning. The results of the evaluation show that our approaches outperform the original approach with static rule learning.","PeriodicalId":442645,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autonomic Forecasting Method Selection: Examination and Ways Ahead\",\"authors\":\"Marwin Züfle, A. Bauer, Veronika Lesch, Christian Krupitzer, N. Herbst, Samuel Kounev, V. Curtef\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAC.2019.00028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proactive adaptation improves the system performance of Autonomic Computing systems as it recognizes adaptation concerns in advance and adapts or prepares adaptation accordingly. To support this, forecasting methods use historical data to predict future system states. According to the \\\"No-Free-Lunch-Theorem\\\", there is no general forecasting method that performs best in all scenarios. Usually at design time, expert knowledge is required to decide on the forecasting method based on the anticipated characteristics of the resulting time series data. The uncertainty that results from the gap between design time and runtime for adaptive systems, as well as the environmental uncertainty at runtime, decreases the possibility that a forecasting method chosen at design time can cope with runtime demands. A common approach to tackle this problem is to use recommendation systems that automatically choose the forecasting methods. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for forecasting method selection and a recommendation-based ensemble forecasting approach. We compare our approaches with one of the most widely used recommendation approaches for time series forecasting. Whereas the reference system uses static recommendation rules, we contrast a modified version which supports dynamic rule learning. The results of the evaluation show that our approaches outperform the original approach with static rule learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2019.00028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2019.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

主动适应可以提高自主计算系统的系统性能,因为它可以提前识别适应问题,并相应地进行适应或准备适应。为了支持这一点,预测方法使用历史数据来预测未来的系统状态。根据“没有免费午餐定理”,没有一种通用的预测方法在所有情况下都表现最好。通常在设计时,需要专家知识来决定基于结果时间序列数据的预期特征的预测方法。自适应系统的设计时间和运行时之间的不确定性,以及运行时环境的不确定性,降低了在设计时选择的预测方法能够满足运行时需求的可能性。解决这个问题的一个常见方法是使用自动选择预测方法的推荐系统。本文提出了一种新的预测方法选择方法和基于推荐的集成预测方法。我们将我们的方法与时间序列预测中最广泛使用的推荐方法之一进行了比较。参考系统使用静态推荐规则,我们对比了一个支持动态规则学习的修改版本。评估结果表明,我们的方法优于原始的静态规则学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autonomic Forecasting Method Selection: Examination and Ways Ahead
Proactive adaptation improves the system performance of Autonomic Computing systems as it recognizes adaptation concerns in advance and adapts or prepares adaptation accordingly. To support this, forecasting methods use historical data to predict future system states. According to the "No-Free-Lunch-Theorem", there is no general forecasting method that performs best in all scenarios. Usually at design time, expert knowledge is required to decide on the forecasting method based on the anticipated characteristics of the resulting time series data. The uncertainty that results from the gap between design time and runtime for adaptive systems, as well as the environmental uncertainty at runtime, decreases the possibility that a forecasting method chosen at design time can cope with runtime demands. A common approach to tackle this problem is to use recommendation systems that automatically choose the forecasting methods. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for forecasting method selection and a recommendation-based ensemble forecasting approach. We compare our approaches with one of the most widely used recommendation approaches for time series forecasting. Whereas the reference system uses static recommendation rules, we contrast a modified version which supports dynamic rule learning. The results of the evaluation show that our approaches outperform the original approach with static rule learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信