干法分离粉砂砾石土的筛分误差

H. Rönnqvist
{"title":"干法分离粉砂砾石土的筛分误差","authors":"H. Rönnqvist","doi":"10.4236/ojce.2019.94022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the \ncurrent European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions \nby the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned \nagainst in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it \nis unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study \ninvestigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel \nsoils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a \ngradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the \nsoil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced \nerrors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An \nempirical best-fit formula is proposed for the \nestimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil. \nFurthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel \nsoils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.","PeriodicalId":302856,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sieving Error from Dry-Separating Silt-Sand-Gravel Soils\",\"authors\":\"H. Rönnqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojce.2019.94022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the \\ncurrent European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions \\nby the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned \\nagainst in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it \\nis unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study \\ninvestigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel \\nsoils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a \\ngradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the \\nsoil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced \\nerrors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An \\nempirical best-fit formula is proposed for the \\nestimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil. \\nFurthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel \\nsoils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2019.94022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2019.94022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在目前的欧洲标准中,通过筛分土壤来测定粒度分布,干燥分离方法是湿法制备的替代方法。由于存在误差的风险,标准中警告不要采用干式分离;但是,对于何时不适合,以及可能引入的误差大小,没有额外的指导。本研究通过与传统湿法制备方法的比较,研究了8种具有不同数量非塑性细粒的无黏性砂砾土的粒径分布情况。研究结果表明,随着土壤中细粒含量的增加,- 0.5 mm部分的筛分误差逐渐增加,并且根据土壤中细粒含量的不同,干分选在粉砂砾石土壤中引入的误差高达45%以上。提出了一种经验最佳拟合公式,用于估算干法制备法在这类土壤上的误差。此外,为了避免筛分误差,研究结果表明,对于粉砂砾石粒度超过2%的土,不应采用干分选法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sieving Error from Dry-Separating Silt-Sand-Gravel Soils
The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the current European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions by the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned against in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it is unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study investigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel soils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a gradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the soil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced errors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An empirical best-fit formula is proposed for the estimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil. Furthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel soils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信