经济结构调整与资本流入:泰国和韩国

Ro Jae-Bong, Kwon Kyoung-Dong
{"title":"经济结构调整与资本流入:泰国和韩国","authors":"Ro Jae-Bong, Kwon Kyoung-Dong","doi":"10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Korea and Thailand which are receiving the financial support from IMF got similar international remarks on promoting the economic reform that has an exemplary effect. However, there are not only differences in the causes of the economic crisis, but also the status and effect of the economic reform. At present, Thailand gets a more ascendant status than South Korea in the \"quo\" status of attracting foreign investment. The reason is that the causes of the economic crisis in Thailand are relatively simple and the process of economic reform is also simple. Besides, Thailand is in the condition which made the effect came true easy. Meanwhile, since the procedures of firing the staff in Thailand are cut off, and the employees are easy to lose their jobs, it insures the flexibility of the labor market. Besides, the Thai government reduces the investment risk of foreigners by way of investing in stocks of the same value or remaining guarantee. South Korea also should insure the flexibility of the labor market and promote the flexibility of attracting foreign investment, which bases on the cooperation of the workers, employees and the government. If transfers the ill creditor's rights to large bank, foreign investors should be encouraged by permitting an alternative of receiving the good asset or government warranty.","PeriodicalId":286252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of East Asian Economic Integration","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea\",\"authors\":\"Ro Jae-Bong, Kwon Kyoung-Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"South Korea and Thailand which are receiving the financial support from IMF got similar international remarks on promoting the economic reform that has an exemplary effect. However, there are not only differences in the causes of the economic crisis, but also the status and effect of the economic reform. At present, Thailand gets a more ascendant status than South Korea in the \\\"quo\\\" status of attracting foreign investment. The reason is that the causes of the economic crisis in Thailand are relatively simple and the process of economic reform is also simple. Besides, Thailand is in the condition which made the effect came true easy. Meanwhile, since the procedures of firing the staff in Thailand are cut off, and the employees are easy to lose their jobs, it insures the flexibility of the labor market. Besides, the Thai government reduces the investment risk of foreigners by way of investing in stocks of the same value or remaining guarantee. South Korea also should insure the flexibility of the labor market and promote the flexibility of attracting foreign investment, which bases on the cooperation of the workers, employees and the government. If transfers the ill creditor's rights to large bank, foreign investors should be encouraged by permitting an alternative of receiving the good asset or government warranty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of East Asian Economic Integration\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of East Asian Economic Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of East Asian Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.1998.2.4.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受国际货币基金组织(IMF)资金支援的韩国和泰国,在国际上也得到了类似的评价,称其推动经济改革,具有示范效果。然而,各国不仅在经济危机产生的原因上存在差异,而且在经济改革的地位和效果上也存在差异。目前,泰国在吸引外资方面的“现状”比韩国更具优势。原因是泰国经济危机的原因比较简单,经济改革的过程也比较简单。此外,泰国所处的条件使这一效果很容易实现。同时,由于在泰国解雇员工的程序被切断,员工很容易失业,这保证了劳动力市场的灵活性。此外,泰国政府通过投资同等价值或剩余担保的股票,降低了外国人的投资风险。韩国也应该确保劳动市场的灵活性,提高以劳动者和政府的合作为基础的吸引外资的灵活性。如果将不良债权转让给大银行,则应允许接受良好资产或政府担保的替代方案,以鼓励外国投资者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic Restructuring and Capital Inflow: Thailand and Korea
South Korea and Thailand which are receiving the financial support from IMF got similar international remarks on promoting the economic reform that has an exemplary effect. However, there are not only differences in the causes of the economic crisis, but also the status and effect of the economic reform. At present, Thailand gets a more ascendant status than South Korea in the "quo" status of attracting foreign investment. The reason is that the causes of the economic crisis in Thailand are relatively simple and the process of economic reform is also simple. Besides, Thailand is in the condition which made the effect came true easy. Meanwhile, since the procedures of firing the staff in Thailand are cut off, and the employees are easy to lose their jobs, it insures the flexibility of the labor market. Besides, the Thai government reduces the investment risk of foreigners by way of investing in stocks of the same value or remaining guarantee. South Korea also should insure the flexibility of the labor market and promote the flexibility of attracting foreign investment, which bases on the cooperation of the workers, employees and the government. If transfers the ill creditor's rights to large bank, foreign investors should be encouraged by permitting an alternative of receiving the good asset or government warranty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信