传统的红狐陷阱的效果和选择性如何?

J. Duarte, M. A. Farfán, J. Fa, Mario Vargas
{"title":"传统的红狐陷阱的效果和选择性如何?","authors":"J. Duarte, M. A. Farfán, J. Fa, Mario Vargas","doi":"10.7325/GALEMYS.2012.A01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We followed a red fox culling campaign that employed traditional cable snares to control numbers in a hunting estate in the Serranía de Ronda (Andalusia, southern Spain). We assessed abundance and presence of carnivore species within the area where fox culling took place by means of faecal counts within regularly walked paths. Twenty animals of four different taxa were snared during 238 nights in 36 locations. Through interviews with informed locals we established there were eight carnivore species present in the study area. Capture efficiency was 1.52 foxes per 1,000 trap-nights; the ISO-selectivity was 65% and the negative specific selectivity 50%. Despite daily checks of snares, there was a very high mortality (>80%) of target and non-target species. Moreover, a large proportion of the animals were caught by the neck. Our results suggest that this traditional method (snares without stops) of predator control should not be used.","PeriodicalId":143015,"journal":{"name":"Galemys, Spanish Journal of Mammalogy","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How effective and selective is traditional Red Fox snaring?\",\"authors\":\"J. Duarte, M. A. Farfán, J. Fa, Mario Vargas\",\"doi\":\"10.7325/GALEMYS.2012.A01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We followed a red fox culling campaign that employed traditional cable snares to control numbers in a hunting estate in the Serranía de Ronda (Andalusia, southern Spain). We assessed abundance and presence of carnivore species within the area where fox culling took place by means of faecal counts within regularly walked paths. Twenty animals of four different taxa were snared during 238 nights in 36 locations. Through interviews with informed locals we established there were eight carnivore species present in the study area. Capture efficiency was 1.52 foxes per 1,000 trap-nights; the ISO-selectivity was 65% and the negative specific selectivity 50%. Despite daily checks of snares, there was a very high mortality (>80%) of target and non-target species. Moreover, a large proportion of the animals were caught by the neck. Our results suggest that this traditional method (snares without stops) of predator control should not be used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Galemys, Spanish Journal of Mammalogy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Galemys, Spanish Journal of Mammalogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7325/GALEMYS.2012.A01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galemys, Spanish Journal of Mammalogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7325/GALEMYS.2012.A01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们跟踪了在Serranía de Ronda(安达卢西亚,西班牙南部)的一个狩猎庄园进行的红狐扑杀活动,该活动采用传统的电缆陷阱来控制数量。我们通过定期步行路径内的粪便计数,评估了在进行狐狸扑杀的区域内食肉动物物种的丰度和存在性。在36个地点的238个夜晚,共捕获了4个不同分类群的20只动物。通过对当地知情人士的采访,我们确定在研究区域有8种食肉动物。捕获效率为每1000个陷阱夜捕获1.52只狐狸;iso选择性为65%,负比选择性为50%。尽管每天检查陷阱,但目标和非目标物种的死亡率非常高(>80%)。此外,很大一部分动物被扼住了脖子。我们的研究结果表明,这种传统的捕食者控制方法(不停止陷阱)不应该使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How effective and selective is traditional Red Fox snaring?
We followed a red fox culling campaign that employed traditional cable snares to control numbers in a hunting estate in the Serranía de Ronda (Andalusia, southern Spain). We assessed abundance and presence of carnivore species within the area where fox culling took place by means of faecal counts within regularly walked paths. Twenty animals of four different taxa were snared during 238 nights in 36 locations. Through interviews with informed locals we established there were eight carnivore species present in the study area. Capture efficiency was 1.52 foxes per 1,000 trap-nights; the ISO-selectivity was 65% and the negative specific selectivity 50%. Despite daily checks of snares, there was a very high mortality (>80%) of target and non-target species. Moreover, a large proportion of the animals were caught by the neck. Our results suggest that this traditional method (snares without stops) of predator control should not be used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信