{"title":"北安加拉地区古库塔雷遗址新石器时代工业标准的重新审视","authors":"A. Chekha","doi":"10.17746/2658-6193.2021.27.0335-0340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of rescue archaeological investigations in the North Angara region due to the Boguchanskaya hydro-electric power plant, many archaeological sites were found, including Ust-Kutarey, Senkin Kamen, Ruchey Povarny, Gora Kutarey. Now active analyses and introduction to scientific use are in process. Due to the specifics of forming cultural sediments and problematic of research of the materials of the region, detailed research, planigraphic analyses and comparison with adjacent and the same age sites in the region become the most important. As a result of a detailed study of the archaeological materials of the Ust-Kutarey site, conditionally “pure” and mixed (with an admixture of Bronze-Medieval Age ceramics) Neolithic complexes were identified. To provide a clearer understanding of the situation in the Ust-Kutarey microregion as a whole, a collection of samples was assembled for a comparative analysis of the materials from the adjacent sites (Gora Kutarey and Senkin (Siniy) Kamen). The research allowed to determine that the territory in the mouth of the Kutarey River was a location with the concentrated production of small laminar splits, and the Gora Kutarey site was a location for the production of adzes, axes, and fan-type scrapers. This article is to summarize previous research data as well as to provide new data on target laminar blanks. As a result, although somewhat conditionally, we could define an earlier (middle) Neolithic (Horizon 2, Layer 2 at the Ust-Kutarey site) and later Neolithic (Layer 3, Horizon 1, Layer 2 at the Ust-Kutarey site, Gora Kutarey).","PeriodicalId":422280,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Criteria of Neolithic Industries on Ust-Kutarey Sites in the North Angara Region\",\"authors\":\"A. Chekha\",\"doi\":\"10.17746/2658-6193.2021.27.0335-0340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a result of rescue archaeological investigations in the North Angara region due to the Boguchanskaya hydro-electric power plant, many archaeological sites were found, including Ust-Kutarey, Senkin Kamen, Ruchey Povarny, Gora Kutarey. Now active analyses and introduction to scientific use are in process. Due to the specifics of forming cultural sediments and problematic of research of the materials of the region, detailed research, planigraphic analyses and comparison with adjacent and the same age sites in the region become the most important. As a result of a detailed study of the archaeological materials of the Ust-Kutarey site, conditionally “pure” and mixed (with an admixture of Bronze-Medieval Age ceramics) Neolithic complexes were identified. To provide a clearer understanding of the situation in the Ust-Kutarey microregion as a whole, a collection of samples was assembled for a comparative analysis of the materials from the adjacent sites (Gora Kutarey and Senkin (Siniy) Kamen). The research allowed to determine that the territory in the mouth of the Kutarey River was a location with the concentrated production of small laminar splits, and the Gora Kutarey site was a location for the production of adzes, axes, and fan-type scrapers. This article is to summarize previous research data as well as to provide new data on target laminar blanks. As a result, although somewhat conditionally, we could define an earlier (middle) Neolithic (Horizon 2, Layer 2 at the Ust-Kutarey site) and later Neolithic (Layer 3, Horizon 1, Layer 2 at the Ust-Kutarey site, Gora Kutarey).\",\"PeriodicalId\":422280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17746/2658-6193.2021.27.0335-0340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17746/2658-6193.2021.27.0335-0340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于Boguchanskaya水电站,在北安加拉地区进行了救援考古调查,发现了许多考古遗址,包括ut -Kutarey, Senkin Kamen, Ruchey Povarny, Gora Kutarey。目前正在进行积极的分析和科学应用的介绍。由于该地区文化沉积物形成的特殊性和材料研究的问题,详细研究、平面分析以及与该地区邻近和同时代遗址的比较成为最重要的。通过对古库塔雷遗址考古材料的详细研究,确定了有条件的“纯”和混合(青铜-中世纪陶瓷的混合物)新石器时代的复合体。为了更清楚地了解整个上库塔雷微区域的情况,收集了一些样品,以便对邻近地点(戈拉库塔雷和森金(西尼)卡门)的材料进行比较分析。研究表明,库塔雷河口地区是小层状裂缝集中生产的地区,而戈拉库塔雷遗址是铲斗、斧头和扇形铲斗的生产地点。本文在总结前人研究成果的同时,也为靶层流毛坯提供了新的研究资料。因此,尽管有些有条件,我们可以定义早期(中期)新石器时代(第2层,Ust-Kutarey遗址的第2层)和晚期新石器时代(第3层,第1层,Ust-Kutarey遗址的第2层,Gora Kutarey)。
Revisiting Criteria of Neolithic Industries on Ust-Kutarey Sites in the North Angara Region
As a result of rescue archaeological investigations in the North Angara region due to the Boguchanskaya hydro-electric power plant, many archaeological sites were found, including Ust-Kutarey, Senkin Kamen, Ruchey Povarny, Gora Kutarey. Now active analyses and introduction to scientific use are in process. Due to the specifics of forming cultural sediments and problematic of research of the materials of the region, detailed research, planigraphic analyses and comparison with adjacent and the same age sites in the region become the most important. As a result of a detailed study of the archaeological materials of the Ust-Kutarey site, conditionally “pure” and mixed (with an admixture of Bronze-Medieval Age ceramics) Neolithic complexes were identified. To provide a clearer understanding of the situation in the Ust-Kutarey microregion as a whole, a collection of samples was assembled for a comparative analysis of the materials from the adjacent sites (Gora Kutarey and Senkin (Siniy) Kamen). The research allowed to determine that the territory in the mouth of the Kutarey River was a location with the concentrated production of small laminar splits, and the Gora Kutarey site was a location for the production of adzes, axes, and fan-type scrapers. This article is to summarize previous research data as well as to provide new data on target laminar blanks. As a result, although somewhat conditionally, we could define an earlier (middle) Neolithic (Horizon 2, Layer 2 at the Ust-Kutarey site) and later Neolithic (Layer 3, Horizon 1, Layer 2 at the Ust-Kutarey site, Gora Kutarey).