跨资产风格溢价资产配置过程

Eugenio Raiteri, M. Malagoli
{"title":"跨资产风格溢价资产配置过程","authors":"Eugenio Raiteri, M. Malagoli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3516051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aim to compare different allocation models to build a portfolio that includes a popular set of alternative risk premia, common to most traditional asset classes. Firstly, we review alternative risk premia, mainly Carry, Value and Momentum, then we create sub-styles and styles portfolios. On each asset class we try to compare in a unified framework different style's definitions, to assess how each choice affects the outcome. Finally we aggregate styles in a composite portfolio. All these steps require several decisions on whether and which risk targeting method to utilize and which allocation model to adopt. We show the main differences and consequences of each decision and how they may affect the final portfolio. Lastly, we cluster different solutions according to a dissimilarity criteria, determining which are the key steps that make strategies actually different from one another.","PeriodicalId":143061,"journal":{"name":"Practitioner Articles & Resources eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Asset Style Premia Asset Allocation Process\",\"authors\":\"Eugenio Raiteri, M. Malagoli\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3516051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We aim to compare different allocation models to build a portfolio that includes a popular set of alternative risk premia, common to most traditional asset classes. Firstly, we review alternative risk premia, mainly Carry, Value and Momentum, then we create sub-styles and styles portfolios. On each asset class we try to compare in a unified framework different style's definitions, to assess how each choice affects the outcome. Finally we aggregate styles in a composite portfolio. All these steps require several decisions on whether and which risk targeting method to utilize and which allocation model to adopt. We show the main differences and consequences of each decision and how they may affect the final portfolio. Lastly, we cluster different solutions according to a dissimilarity criteria, determining which are the key steps that make strategies actually different from one another.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practitioner Articles & Resources eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practitioner Articles & Resources eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3516051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practitioner Articles & Resources eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3516051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是比较不同的配置模型,以建立一个投资组合,其中包括一套流行的替代风险溢价,这是大多数传统资产类别所共有的。首先,我们回顾了另类风险溢价,主要是Carry, Value和动量,然后我们创建了子风格和风格组合。在每个资产类别上,我们试图在统一的框架中比较不同风格的定义,以评估每种选择如何影响结果。最后,我们在一个组合投资组合中聚合样式。所有这些步骤都需要决定是否使用哪种风险定位方法以及采用哪种分配模型。我们展示了每个决定的主要差异和后果,以及它们如何影响最终的投资组合。最后,我们根据不同的标准对不同的解决方案进行聚类,确定哪些是使策略实际上彼此不同的关键步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Asset Style Premia Asset Allocation Process
We aim to compare different allocation models to build a portfolio that includes a popular set of alternative risk premia, common to most traditional asset classes. Firstly, we review alternative risk premia, mainly Carry, Value and Momentum, then we create sub-styles and styles portfolios. On each asset class we try to compare in a unified framework different style's definitions, to assess how each choice affects the outcome. Finally we aggregate styles in a composite portfolio. All these steps require several decisions on whether and which risk targeting method to utilize and which allocation model to adopt. We show the main differences and consequences of each decision and how they may affect the final portfolio. Lastly, we cluster different solutions according to a dissimilarity criteria, determining which are the key steps that make strategies actually different from one another.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信