RFID互认证协议分析

C. R. Guo
{"title":"RFID互认证协议分析","authors":"C. R. Guo","doi":"10.1109/WCNC.2009.4917595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to secure RFID transactions, an authentication scheme has originally been included as part of the \"EPC Gen2\" industrial standard. This scheme, however, has been found to have some weaknesses. To overcome such weaknesses, some authors have proposed new schemes to improve its security. Two of the latest proposals are the Lim-Li protocol and the Konidala-Kim-Kim protocol presented in 2007. We propose an attack that can be applied to both these protocols. In both cases, the Search Space for the password(s) used have been drastically reduced, which effectively breaks the security of these protocols.","PeriodicalId":186150,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of RFID Mutual Authentication Protocols\",\"authors\":\"C. R. Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WCNC.2009.4917595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to secure RFID transactions, an authentication scheme has originally been included as part of the \\\"EPC Gen2\\\" industrial standard. This scheme, however, has been found to have some weaknesses. To overcome such weaknesses, some authors have proposed new schemes to improve its security. Two of the latest proposals are the Lim-Li protocol and the Konidala-Kim-Kim protocol presented in 2007. We propose an attack that can be applied to both these protocols. In both cases, the Search Space for the password(s) used have been drastically reduced, which effectively breaks the security of these protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2009.4917595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2009.4917595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确保RFID交易的安全,认证方案最初被包含在“EPC Gen2”工业标准中。然而,人们发现这个方案有一些弱点。为了克服这些弱点,一些作者提出了新的方案来提高其安全性。最近的两个提议是2007年提出的林-李议定书和科尼达拉-金-金议定书。我们提出了一种可以应用于这两个协议的攻击。在这两种情况下,所使用的密码的搜索空间都大大减少,这有效地破坏了这些协议的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of RFID Mutual Authentication Protocols
In order to secure RFID transactions, an authentication scheme has originally been included as part of the "EPC Gen2" industrial standard. This scheme, however, has been found to have some weaknesses. To overcome such weaknesses, some authors have proposed new schemes to improve its security. Two of the latest proposals are the Lim-Li protocol and the Konidala-Kim-Kim protocol presented in 2007. We propose an attack that can be applied to both these protocols. In both cases, the Search Space for the password(s) used have been drastically reduced, which effectively breaks the security of these protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信