创造力和白手起家的世界观

L. Gabora
{"title":"创造力和白手起家的世界观","authors":"L. Gabora","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190462321.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creativity is usefully viewed from the perspective of personal “worldviews.” which describe the mind as experienced subjectively, from the inside. The worldview of an uncreative person reflects what they’ve been told, while the worldview of a creative person reflects what they’ve done with what they’ve been told to create a self-made worldview. The capacity to generate such a self-made worldview arose first with development of the capacity for one thought to trigger another thought. This chaining allows free-association, critical reflection, or complex behavioural thought sequences to be created and recalled for material with high psychological entropy to be restructured to form a new idea or perspective. However, a second capacity important for creative thought also is needed: contextual focus, the ability to adaptively shift between convergent and divergent modes of thought. Whereas chaining allows the connecting of closely related items in memory, contextual focus enables the forging of distant connections for sophisticated creative expression. Chaining is sufficient for “little-c”, everyday creative ideas, but contextual focus is need for the generation of those “big-C” creative ideas that define major conceptual shifts. These phenomena of mind arise at the level of the brain with coordinated activity of groups of collectively co-spiking neurons (neural cliques). Those that respond to more general or abstract aspects of a situation offer a straightforward mechanism for contextual focus, for example; with associative thought, as more aspects of a situation are taken into account, more neural cliques are recruited. Gabora’s global mind perspective highlights the evolutionary significance of creativity: cultural evolution became possible with the emergence of a creative worldviews that are self-organizing, self-mending, communally interacting, and self-propagating.","PeriodicalId":311266,"journal":{"name":"Secrets of Creativity","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creativity and the Self-Made Worldview\",\"authors\":\"L. Gabora\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190462321.003.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Creativity is usefully viewed from the perspective of personal “worldviews.” which describe the mind as experienced subjectively, from the inside. The worldview of an uncreative person reflects what they’ve been told, while the worldview of a creative person reflects what they’ve done with what they’ve been told to create a self-made worldview. The capacity to generate such a self-made worldview arose first with development of the capacity for one thought to trigger another thought. This chaining allows free-association, critical reflection, or complex behavioural thought sequences to be created and recalled for material with high psychological entropy to be restructured to form a new idea or perspective. However, a second capacity important for creative thought also is needed: contextual focus, the ability to adaptively shift between convergent and divergent modes of thought. Whereas chaining allows the connecting of closely related items in memory, contextual focus enables the forging of distant connections for sophisticated creative expression. Chaining is sufficient for “little-c”, everyday creative ideas, but contextual focus is need for the generation of those “big-C” creative ideas that define major conceptual shifts. These phenomena of mind arise at the level of the brain with coordinated activity of groups of collectively co-spiking neurons (neural cliques). Those that respond to more general or abstract aspects of a situation offer a straightforward mechanism for contextual focus, for example; with associative thought, as more aspects of a situation are taken into account, more neural cliques are recruited. Gabora’s global mind perspective highlights the evolutionary significance of creativity: cultural evolution became possible with the emergence of a creative worldviews that are self-organizing, self-mending, communally interacting, and self-propagating.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Secrets of Creativity\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Secrets of Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190462321.003.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secrets of Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190462321.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从个人“世界观”的角度来看待创造力是有益的。,它描述了心灵是主观的,从内部体验的。一个没有创造力的人的世界观反映了他们被告知的东西,而一个有创造力的人的世界观反映了他们按照被告知的东西所做的事情,从而创造了一个自己的世界观。产生这种自我创造的世界观的能力首先是随着一种思想触发另一种思想的能力的发展而出现的。这种链接允许自由联想、批判性反思或复杂的行为思维序列的创建和回忆,以重组具有高心理熵的材料,形成新的想法或观点。然而,创造性思维还需要第二种重要的能力:上下文焦点,即在聚合和发散思维模式之间适应性转换的能力。链式思维可以将记忆中密切相关的事物联系起来,而上下文聚焦则可以建立远距离的联系,从而实现复杂的创造性表达。链接对于“小c”的日常创意已经足够了,但是上下文聚焦对于那些定义重大概念转变的“大c”创意创意的产生是必要的。这些心理现象产生于大脑层面,是由集体共同刺激的神经元群(神经集团)协调活动产生的。例如,那些对情境的更一般或抽象方面做出反应的人提供了一种直接的情境焦点机制;在联想思维中,当考虑到一个情况的更多方面时,就会招募更多的神经集团。Gabora的全球思维视角强调了创造力的进化意义:随着自我组织、自我修复、社区互动和自我传播的创造性世界观的出现,文化进化成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creativity and the Self-Made Worldview
Creativity is usefully viewed from the perspective of personal “worldviews.” which describe the mind as experienced subjectively, from the inside. The worldview of an uncreative person reflects what they’ve been told, while the worldview of a creative person reflects what they’ve done with what they’ve been told to create a self-made worldview. The capacity to generate such a self-made worldview arose first with development of the capacity for one thought to trigger another thought. This chaining allows free-association, critical reflection, or complex behavioural thought sequences to be created and recalled for material with high psychological entropy to be restructured to form a new idea or perspective. However, a second capacity important for creative thought also is needed: contextual focus, the ability to adaptively shift between convergent and divergent modes of thought. Whereas chaining allows the connecting of closely related items in memory, contextual focus enables the forging of distant connections for sophisticated creative expression. Chaining is sufficient for “little-c”, everyday creative ideas, but contextual focus is need for the generation of those “big-C” creative ideas that define major conceptual shifts. These phenomena of mind arise at the level of the brain with coordinated activity of groups of collectively co-spiking neurons (neural cliques). Those that respond to more general or abstract aspects of a situation offer a straightforward mechanism for contextual focus, for example; with associative thought, as more aspects of a situation are taken into account, more neural cliques are recruited. Gabora’s global mind perspective highlights the evolutionary significance of creativity: cultural evolution became possible with the emergence of a creative worldviews that are self-organizing, self-mending, communally interacting, and self-propagating.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信