通过对环境保护法的诉讼解决争端

I. K. Tjukup, I. Krisnawati
{"title":"通过对环境保护法的诉讼解决争端","authors":"I. K. Tjukup, I. Krisnawati","doi":"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I2.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental dispute settlement through litigation lines is strictly regulated in Law No. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Environmental Management. The former law pointed HIR and RBg, PERMA No. 1 2002 Event Class Action. HIR and RBg did not set a class action, strict liability, legal standing, citizen lawsuit. Rules pluralistic diffi cult as the legal basis of environmental law dispute resolution. Problematic in civil law will cause blurring of norms, conflict norms, norms vacancy, will bring the consequences of law enforcers. If the law enforcement believes the law is the law, so that the rule of law, justice, expediency, which is the purpose of the law, it is diffi cult to realize. Based on legal issues cause problems pluralistic level, the rules, while the class action always demands are not accepted on the grounds HIR, RBg not set. Based on juridical issues, sociological and philosophical issue of whether arrangements formulated civil judicial procedure in civil Environmental Law Enforcement has been inadequate. Normative legal research writing method and in qualitative analysis to obtain quality legal materials. According to Law No. 48 the Year 2009 on Judicial Power, with the principle of ius curia Novit, a judge can do rechtsvinding. The rule of law in the enforcement raises multi pluralistic interpretation.Keywords: ","PeriodicalId":426891,"journal":{"name":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Upaya Litigasi di Bidang Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Keperdataan\",\"authors\":\"I. K. Tjukup, I. Krisnawati\",\"doi\":\"10.36913/JHAPER.V4I2.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental dispute settlement through litigation lines is strictly regulated in Law No. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Environmental Management. The former law pointed HIR and RBg, PERMA No. 1 2002 Event Class Action. HIR and RBg did not set a class action, strict liability, legal standing, citizen lawsuit. Rules pluralistic diffi cult as the legal basis of environmental law dispute resolution. Problematic in civil law will cause blurring of norms, conflict norms, norms vacancy, will bring the consequences of law enforcers. If the law enforcement believes the law is the law, so that the rule of law, justice, expediency, which is the purpose of the law, it is diffi cult to realize. Based on legal issues cause problems pluralistic level, the rules, while the class action always demands are not accepted on the grounds HIR, RBg not set. Based on juridical issues, sociological and philosophical issue of whether arrangements formulated civil judicial procedure in civil Environmental Law Enforcement has been inadequate. Normative legal research writing method and in qualitative analysis to obtain quality legal materials. According to Law No. 48 the Year 2009 on Judicial Power, with the principle of ius curia Novit, a judge can do rechtsvinding. The rule of law in the enforcement raises multi pluralistic interpretation.Keywords: \",\"PeriodicalId\":426891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I2.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36913/JHAPER.V4I2.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2009年《保护和环境管理法》第32号法对通过诉讼方式解决环境纠纷作出了严格规定。前法律指向HIR和RBg, PERMA 2002年第1号事件集体诉讼。HIR和RBg没有设定集体诉讼、严格责任、法律地位、公民诉讼。规则多元化作为环境法纠纷解决的法律依据。民法中的问题会造成规范的模糊、规范的冲突、规范的空缺,会给执法者带来后果。如果执法者相信法律就是法律,那么法治、公正、权宜,这是法律的宗旨,就很难实现。基于法律问题引发问题的多元化层面,而集体诉讼总是要求不被接受,理由是HIR、RBg不设。基于司法问题,社会学和哲学问题是否安排制定民事司法程序在民事环境执法中一直存在不足。规范法律研究的写作方法,并在定性分析中获取优质的法律资料。根据2009年关于司法权的第48号法律,法官可以根据既审即审的原则进行复审。法治在执法中提出了多元的解释。关键词:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Upaya Litigasi di Bidang Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Keperdataan
Environmental dispute settlement through litigation lines is strictly regulated in Law No. 32 of 2009 on the Protection and Environmental Management. The former law pointed HIR and RBg, PERMA No. 1 2002 Event Class Action. HIR and RBg did not set a class action, strict liability, legal standing, citizen lawsuit. Rules pluralistic diffi cult as the legal basis of environmental law dispute resolution. Problematic in civil law will cause blurring of norms, conflict norms, norms vacancy, will bring the consequences of law enforcers. If the law enforcement believes the law is the law, so that the rule of law, justice, expediency, which is the purpose of the law, it is diffi cult to realize. Based on legal issues cause problems pluralistic level, the rules, while the class action always demands are not accepted on the grounds HIR, RBg not set. Based on juridical issues, sociological and philosophical issue of whether arrangements formulated civil judicial procedure in civil Environmental Law Enforcement has been inadequate. Normative legal research writing method and in qualitative analysis to obtain quality legal materials. According to Law No. 48 the Year 2009 on Judicial Power, with the principle of ius curia Novit, a judge can do rechtsvinding. The rule of law in the enforcement raises multi pluralistic interpretation.Keywords: 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信