{"title":"这不只是政治，是吗?","authors":"Stella-Monica N. Mpande","doi":"10.4324/9781351031660-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If you follow Supreme Court decision-making – and, after all, if you listen to this podcast – you’ve probably noticed the tendency of Supreme Court watchers, whether they are highly respected reporters or less thoughtful armchair pundits, to portray decisions as simple battles between “conservatives” and “liberals.” Yet, attributing Supreme Court decision-making to just politics is like watching black-and-white TV, rather than hi-def.","PeriodicalId":334038,"journal":{"name":"The Diaspora's Role in Africa","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It's not just politics … or is it?\",\"authors\":\"Stella-Monica N. Mpande\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781351031660-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If you follow Supreme Court decision-making – and, after all, if you listen to this podcast – you’ve probably noticed the tendency of Supreme Court watchers, whether they are highly respected reporters or less thoughtful armchair pundits, to portray decisions as simple battles between “conservatives” and “liberals.” Yet, attributing Supreme Court decision-making to just politics is like watching black-and-white TV, rather than hi-def.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Diaspora's Role in Africa\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Diaspora's Role in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351031660-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Diaspora's Role in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351031660-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
If you follow Supreme Court decision-making – and, after all, if you listen to this podcast – you’ve probably noticed the tendency of Supreme Court watchers, whether they are highly respected reporters or less thoughtful armchair pundits, to portray decisions as simple battles between “conservatives” and “liberals.” Yet, attributing Supreme Court decision-making to just politics is like watching black-and-white TV, rather than hi-def.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
